MOT Status
ValidMileage
109,263 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing x2 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge x2 (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced bulkhead (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened x2 (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing x2 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge x2 (5.2.3 (e))
Headlamp aim too far to the right (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced bulkhead (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened x2 (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Central Rear Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Fluid leak, but not excessive General leaks from engine, gearbox, transfer box and front axle/hubs (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Cracking in tread, some quite deep (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Chassis leg - rear cross member mounting / Upper spring mount area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Chassis leg - rear cross member mounting / Upper spring mount area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Central Rear Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Fluid leak, but not excessive General leaks from engine, gearbox, transfer box and front axle/hubs (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Cracking in tread, some quite deep (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Offside Front Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting (6.6.6)
Offside Front Brake master cylinder/servo mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (3.6.C.3)
Offside Rear Vehicle structure excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting (6.6.6)
Nearside Front Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Offside Front Seat belt damaged but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Rear exhaust box tailpipe missing
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
o/s front floor rusty
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
o/s front floor rusty
both headlight patterns poor
brake fluid close to min
front belt webs in poor condition on limit
front prop joint poor condition
gearbox oil leak
handbrake linkage well worn on limit
metal brake pipes corroded to limit in some places plus coating in areas
n/s/f chassis outrigger slight distorsion
n/s/f seat belt buckle appears loose but secure (in plastic housing)
o/s/f floor well corroded near body mount only mount with corrosion (6.1)
pads low
steering box and pump damp to limit no drips when testing
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Fuel system component leaking (7.2.3)
Emissions not tested (7.0)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
both headlight patterns poor
brake fluid close to min
front belt webs in poor condition on limit
front prop joint poor condition
gearbox oil leak
handbrake linkage well worn on limit
metal brake pipes corroded to limit in some places plus coating in areas
n/s/f chassis outrigger slight distorsion
n/s/f seat belt buckle appears loose but secure (in plastic housing)
o/s/f floor well corroded near body mount only mount with corrosion (6.1)
pads low
steering box and pump damp to limit no drips when testing
Oil leaking from gearbox.
Power steering pump has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Power steering pump has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Rear disc pads low.
Fuel system component leaking (7.2.3)
Hazard warning tell tale not working correctly (1.4.B.1e)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Rear fog lamp tell tale not working (1.3.1b)
Oil leaking from gearbox.
Power steering pump has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Power steering pump has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Rear disc pads low.
How Reliable is the Land Rover Defender?
Based on 2,960,045 MOT tests across 181,953 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
JOE 35 is a 1989 Land Rover Defender in Green with a 2,495cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 1989 Land Rover Defender models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.8% with a typical mileage of 127,912 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Land Rover Defender fails its MOT is shock absorber has an excessively worn bush, accounting for 77,499 recorded failures. If you're considering buying JOE 35, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Land Rover Defender typically stays on UK roads for around 43 years. At 37 years old, this Land Rover Defender is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of JOE 35?
You can check the full history of JOE 35 by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was JOE 35 registered?
JOE 35 is a 1989 Land Rover Defender, first registered on 31 December 1989.
Is JOE 35 safe to buy?
The MOT history for JOE 35 shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does JOE 35 have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on JOE 35. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.