MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
21,571 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Hazard warning switch faulty (1.4.B.1d)
Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Front Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1) DANGEROUS
bind from rear brakes
front inner wings corroded
n/s/f inner gaitor weeping grease
o/s/r inner arch corroded
rear footbrake low readings
rear silencer corroded and blowing
steering uj tight
corrosion to front inner wings
handbrake poor
n/s/f brake binding
Offside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
corrosion to front inner wings
handbrake poor
n/s/f brake binding
bind on both front brakes
both front coil spring top mounts corroded
both front coil springs corroded
low braking effort from o/s/r handbrake and footbrake
n/s/f caliper looks damp
slight play in n/s/r wheel bearing
strong smell of diesel under bonnet and injector pump looks damp
unable to open o/s/r door
ADVISE SLIGHT BIND FROM FRONT TYRES - HANDBRAKE CABLES IN POOR CONDITION - BIND FROM REAR BRAKES
Fuel system component leaking (7.2.3)
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
ADVISE SLIGHT BIND FROM FRONT TYRES - HANDBRAKE CABLES IN POOR CONDITION - BIND FROM REAR BRAKES
ADVISE corrosion around o/s/f shock, steering uj tight, n/s/r handbrake cable poor condition, corrosion to inner sills and boot floor
alternator belt in poor condition
engine and gear oil leaks
front leg bottom spring cups corroded
handbrake cables in poor condition
inner sills corroded
n/s/r brake and o/s/f brake binding on
rear chassis corroded
Offside Rear Shock absorber insecure (2.7.2b)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
alternator belt in poor condition
engine and gear oil leaks
front leg bottom spring cups corroded
handbrake cables in poor condition
inner sills corroded
n/s/r brake and o/s/f brake binding on
rear chassis corroded
advise centre section blowing
advise n/s/r handbrake cable in poor condition
advise n/s/r shock bolt possibly loose
advise screen washers not working very well
advise slight bind from front brakes
advise centre pipe blowing slightly
Braking system leaking (3.6.A.1)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
o/s/f seatbelt catch sticking
slight bind from o/s/f + o/s/r brakes
slight blow from centre section
How Reliable is the Peugeot 309?
Based on 93,983 MOT tests across 21,848 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
K105 JPW is a 1993 Peugeot 309 in Blue with a 1,905cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 58.3%.
Across all 1993 Peugeot 309 models, the average MOT pass rate is 63.2% with a typical mileage of 105,310 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot 309 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 5,920 recorded failures. If you're considering buying K105 JPW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 309 typically stays on UK roads for around 40 years. At 33 years old, this Peugeot 309 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of K105 JPW?
You can check the full history of K105 JPW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was K105 JPW registered?
K105 JPW is a 1993 Peugeot 309, first registered on 12 March 1993.
Is K105 JPW safe to buy?
The MOT history for K105 JPW shows 12 tests with a 58.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does K105 JPW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on K105 JPW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.