MOT Status
ValidMileage
48,242 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened n/s & o/s hubs (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength outer sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength n/s & o/s inner sills (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened n/s & o/s hubs (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
corrosion to sills/wheel arches around suspension component mounting areas.
dampness on rear shock absorbers.
general corrosion to bodywork.Bad in places.
oil leaks.
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Brake load sensing valve linkage seized (3.6.E.3) DANGEROUS
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a) DANGEROUS
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
corrosion to sills/wheel arches around suspension component mounting areas.
dampness on rear shock absorbers.
general corrosion to bodywork.Bad in places.
oil leaks.
corrosion to bodywork.
corrosion to doors.
corrosion to sills and wheel arches.
damage to nearside mirror.
dampness on nearside rear shock absorber.
deterioration to wiper blades.
oil leaks.
rear brakes 24% imbalanced.
service brake effort 51%. parking brake effort 17% braking system only just meets requirements.
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) insecure (1.1.A.3a)
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a) DANGEROUS
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
corrosion to bodywork.
corrosion to doors.
corrosion to sills and wheel arches.
damage to nearside mirror.
dampness on nearside rear shock absorber.
deterioration to wiper blades.
oil leaks.
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
corrosion to bodywork.
corrosion to sills/wheel arches.
damage to offside rear lamp unit.
dampness to nearside rear shock absorber.
noise from rear wheel bearings.
rear brakes 63% imbalanced.
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a) DANGEROUS
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
body work corroded,wings,floors,sills etc.Badly in places.
corrsion to all body work
rear brakes 30% imdalance
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
offside outer driveshaft gaitor starting to perish
offside wiper blade split
vehicle has advanced corrosion in many areas including rear wheelarches and offside front door
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
Nearside Rear wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.6.1)
Offside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Nail in nearside rear tyre
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
offside outer driveshaft gaitor starting to perish
offside wiper blade split
vehicle has advanced corrosion in many areas including rear wheelarches and offside front door
corrosion to bodywork.
corrosion to sills.
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.6.1) DANGEROUS
corrosion to bodywork.
corrosion to sills.
corrosion to offside and nearside rear wheel arches
corrosion to offside front door
corrosion to offside sill
Nearside Rear Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
corrosion to exhaust downpipe
corrosion to offside door
corrosion to rear wheel arches and sills
spare tyre below legal limit
How Reliable is the Rover Maestro?
Based on 31,503 MOT tests across 6,914 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
K37 SEA is a 1992 Rover Maestro in White with a 1,275cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 30 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 1992 Rover Maestro models, the average MOT pass rate is 65.1% with a typical mileage of 76,637 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover Maestro fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 3,111 recorded failures. If you're considering buying K37 SEA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover Maestro typically stays on UK roads for around 38 years. At 34 years old, this Rover Maestro is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of K37 SEA?
You can check the full history of K37 SEA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was K37 SEA registered?
K37 SEA is a 1992 Rover Maestro, first registered on 3 August 1992.
Is K37 SEA safe to buy?
The MOT history for K37 SEA shows 30 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does K37 SEA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on K37 SEA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.