MOT Status
ValidMileage
185,467 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All on van (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Exhaust slight leak at rear flexi, exhaust corroded
Front Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both Trailing arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
slight Oil leaks on engine
Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded Both Rear along axle to flexis (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure is so weakened by corrosion within 30cm of a towbar mounting, the towbar is likely to become detached (6.1.6 (i) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Vehicle structure is so weakened by corrosion within 30cm of a towbar mounting, the towbar is likely to become detached (6.1.6 (i) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All on van (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Exhaust slight leak at rear flexi, exhaust corroded
Front Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both Trailing arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
slight Oil leaks on engine
Both head lights fuzzy
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material All (1.1.11 (c))
Coil spring corroded All 4 (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both and bushes perished and split (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Slight oil leak
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both front inner wings at front bumper area , corroded and holed (5.3.6 (a) (i))
All brake pipes covered in under-seal
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Underside corroded
sills corroded
slight oil leak
vehicle subframes corroded
vehicle suspension corroded
vehicle underside corroded
wheel arches corroded
Headlamp not working on dipped beam Both , go on then very dim (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Both (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Wheel arches and sills corroded
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear wheel arches corroded
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier leisure (4.13 (a) (i))
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive under sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Steering rack gaiter damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive under sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
general age related corrosion
Central Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Corrosion on sills
Offside inner sill corroded
Rear rear brake pipes have a coating, unable to test to standards
excessive underbody corrosion
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside inner sill corroded
Rear rear brake pipes have a coating, unable to test to standards
excessive underbody corrosion
Nearside Front boot deteriorated and excessive play
Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Rear tyres poor condition
All 4 tyres deteriorated
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
rear tyres are perrished but no cord is exposed
How Reliable is the Mazda Bongo?
Based on 251,584 MOT tests across 14,362 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
K60 MJF is a 1998 Mazda Bongo in White with a 2,490cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81.8%.
Across all 1998 Mazda Bongo models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.1% with a typical mileage of 125,789 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mazda Bongo fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 6,854 recorded failures. If you're considering buying K60 MJF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda Bongo typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 28 years old, this Mazda Bongo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of K60 MJF?
You can check the full history of K60 MJF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was K60 MJF registered?
K60 MJF is a 1998 Mazda Bongo, first registered on 31 December 1998.
Is K60 MJF safe to buy?
The MOT history for K60 MJF shows 22 tests with a 81.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does K60 MJF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on K60 MJF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.