MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
99,766 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive surface corrosion around shock absorber top mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced vehicle under-body showing general surface corrosion in places (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front coolant pipe hose clips corroded and broken
Offside Rear hub back-plate corroded away
all brake discs showing surface corrosion
bonnet corroded along front edge
Horn not working (7.7 (a) (ii))
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive surface corrosion around shock absorber top mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced vehicle under-body showing general surface corrosion in places (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front coolant pipe hose clips corroded and broken
Offside Rear hub back-plate corroded away
all brake discs showing surface corrosion
bonnet corroded along front edge
Brake pedal has insufficient reserve travel spongey (1.1.2 (a))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
Front Headlamp levelling device inoperative both sides (4.1.5 (a))
Front Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced crossmember (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Road wheel fixing missing nut missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Hazard warning lamps inoperative all (4.4.1 (e))
Nearside Rear Road wheel fixing missing nut missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Road wheel fixing missing nut missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced inner sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced both inner boot floor panels (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive surface corrosion around shocker top mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Fuel tank slightly loose does not seem to be fitted correctly (6.1.3 (a) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced vehicle under-body showing surface corrosion in other areas (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe inadequately clipped or supported near fuel tank (1.1.11 (d) (i))
Offside Front coolant pipe hose clips corroded and broken
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
fuel pipes corroded
vehicle overheated during mot test
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Offside front brake juddering severely (3.7.A.2b)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
front crossmember under radiator corroded
Offside Rear Body has a projection caused by corrosion (6.1.C.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
front cross member under radiator corroded
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Front registration plate faded (6.3.1d)
Offside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded (3.6.B.4e)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated and cannot function as intended (2.4.F.3)
Offside Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded (3.6.B.4e)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.5c)
How Reliable is the Peugeot 309?
Based on 93,983 MOT tests across 21,848 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
K644 GVO is a 1992 Peugeot 309 in Green with a 1,905cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 55.6%.
Across all 1992 Peugeot 309 models, the average MOT pass rate is 63.6% with a typical mileage of 103,754 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot 309 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 5,920 recorded failures. If you're considering buying K644 GVO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 309 typically stays on UK roads for around 40 years. At 34 years old, this Peugeot 309 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of K644 GVO?
You can check the full history of K644 GVO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was K644 GVO registered?
K644 GVO is a 1992 Peugeot 309, first registered on 3 November 1992.
Is K644 GVO safe to buy?
The MOT history for K644 GVO shows 18 tests with a 55.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does K644 GVO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on K644 GVO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.