MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
74,205 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Radius arm has slight play in a pin bearing (2.4.G.2)
Nearside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Radius arm has slight play in a pin bearing (2.4.G.2)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
battery insecure
creak from rear suspension!!!
fuel tank is damaged / dented!!!
nearside & offside front to rear metal brake pipes are undersealed at rear!!!
nearside & offside rear wheel arches are corroded!!!
nearside front carpet left up! able to see weld repair from inside vehicle!
nearside front underside of floor has been fillered & undersealed!?
nearside outer sill, weld repair & fillered & undersealed!!!
offside outer sill is corroding!
rear seat backs are in a poor condition! (damaged!)
rear subframe mount straps have been undersealed!!!
various areas of underside of vehicle have been undersealed!!!
Subframe mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired (2.4.A.3)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
FRONT BRAKE READINGS UNEVEN †N/S 160 †O/S 230
FUEL TANK BADLY DAMAGED
N/S/R OUTER SILL REPAIR COVERED OVER WITH FILLER
Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
O/S OUTER SILL CORRODED
O/S/R WHEEL ARCH BADLY CORRODED
Offside Inner Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
REAR SUSPENSION NO DAMPER ACTION
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
battery insecure
Nearside Brake clevis joint has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Rear Body has a sharp edge caused by damage (6.1.C.1)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching into the swept area by more than 40mm outside zone 'A' (8.3.1e)
FRONT BRAKE PADS LOOK THIN
FUEL TANK BADLY DAMAGED
Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
N/S/F FLASHER LENS BROKEN
N/S/OUTER SILL CORRODED
O/S/OUTER SILL CORRODED
O/S/R WHEEL ARCH BADLY CORRODED
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
REAR SUSPENSION NO DAMPER ACTION
battery insecure
How Reliable is the Rover Metro?
Based on 277,779 MOT tests across 68,023 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
K94 CDU is a 1992 Rover Metro in White with a 1,120cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 3 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 33.3%.
Across all 1992 Rover Metro models, the average MOT pass rate is 62.8% with a typical mileage of 51,343 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Rover Metro fails its MOT is seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 34,808 recorded failures. If you're considering buying K94 CDU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover Metro typically stays on UK roads for around 37 years. At 34 years old, this Rover Metro is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of K94 CDU?
You can check the full history of K94 CDU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was K94 CDU registered?
K94 CDU is a 1992 Rover Metro, first registered on 19 October 1992.
Is K94 CDU safe to buy?
The MOT history for K94 CDU shows 3 tests with a 33.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does K94 CDU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on K94 CDU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.