MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
122,815 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Fuel tank strap modified
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced All outriggers corroded but not within 30cm of mounting (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both to hoses (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Oil leak, but not excessive hub seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced All (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Headlamp not working on main beam both (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Leaf spring shackle pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength rear of leaf spring (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Leaf spring shackle pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength rear of leaf spring (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps both (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Fuel tank strap modified
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced All outriggers corroded but not within 30cm of mounting (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both to hoses (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Oil leak, but not excessive hub seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced All (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair (1.2.1 (c))
Front Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair (1.2.1 (c))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn outer edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
all rear outriggers corroded not in prescribed area
all underside slightly corroded
Nearside Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced slightly corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension component ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar ball joint excessively worn both rear drop links (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn both rear anti roll bar bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension component ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced slightly corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Damage on screen not affecting drivers veiw
Nearside Front Lower Ball joint moderate movement
Battery insecure and likely to cause a short circuit (4.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamps Rear x2 (4.7.2 (a))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake has no recorded effort at a wheel Nill (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Damage on screen not affecting drivers veiw
Nearside Front Lower Ball joint moderate movement
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement D bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Brake load sensing valve seized (3.6.E.3)
Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
How Reliable is the Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB?
Based on 17,415 MOT tests across 1,451 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KE54 AXP is a 2004 Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB in Red with a 2,300cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.3%.
Across all 2004 Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.0% with a typical mileage of 113,013 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 1,255 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KE54 AXP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB typically stays on UK roads for around 22 years. At 22 years old, this Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KE54 AXP?
You can check the full history of KE54 AXP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KE54 AXP registered?
KE54 AXP is a 2004 Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB, first registered on 1 November 2004.
Is KE54 AXP safe to buy?
The MOT history for KE54 AXP shows 22 tests with a 77.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KE54 AXP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KE54 AXP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.