MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
183,366 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Bonnet primary retaining device ineffective (3.1 (c))
Central Rear Other passenger door does not latch securely closed (6.2.3 (a))
Nearside Front Battery insecure and likely to cause a short circuit (4.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Bumper insecure (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Bumper insecure (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective rear box rubber mounting split (6.1.2 (a))
Horn insecure under bonnet still operating fine
Nearside Front corner of bumper come away slightly
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge uneven wear on inner shoulder (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Non obligatory mirror damaged wing mirror, 1 of mirrors damaged ()
Offside Rear Light lense slightly damaged
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides, inner and outer bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes just met imbalance requirements
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured both sides (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Exhaust tailpipe corroded
Sealant round brake servo pipe
Front Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low Adjuster missing (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Service brake lagging in operation (1.2.1 (d))
Nearside Front Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Nearside Rear Brake disc contaminated (1.1.14 (b))
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage loose broken off (7.1.1 (b))
Offside Front Seat belt buckle damaged broken off (7.1.2 (d))
Offside Front Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt likely to become detached in the event of a collision broken off (7.1.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Coolant light on dash illuminated
Exhaust mounting defective rear box rubber mounting split (6.1.2 (a))
Horn insecure under bonnet still operating fine
Nearside Front corner of bumper come away slightly
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low adjusted (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge uneven wear on inner shoulder (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Non obligatory mirror damaged wing mirror, 1 of mirrors damaged ()
Offside Rear Light lense slightly damaged
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides, inner and outer bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes just met imbalance requirements
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured both sides (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Exhaust tailpipe corroded
Sealant round brake servo pipe
Nearside Rear Braking system leaking (3.6.A.1)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (3.7.B.5b)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Rear Braking system leaking (3.6.A.1)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
How Reliable is the Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB?
Based on 17,415 MOT tests across 1,451 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KE56 ATU is a 2006 Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB in Silver with a 2,287cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 2006 Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB models, the average MOT pass rate is 65.5% with a typical mileage of 134,175 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 1,255 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KE56 ATU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB typically stays on UK roads for around 22 years. At 20 years old, this Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KE56 ATU?
You can check the full history of KE56 ATU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KE56 ATU registered?
KE56 ATU is a 2006 Iveco Daily 35S12 LWB, first registered on 1 November 2006.
Is KE56 ATU safe to buy?
The MOT history for KE56 ATU shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KE56 ATU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KE56 ATU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.