MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
22,213 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front mudguard missing.
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Brake effort inadequate at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Brake component inadequately mounted Brake lever mounting very loose (1.1.21 (c))
Rear Brake effort inadequate at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp missing in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Steering headbearing excessively stiff or notchy Notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Rear Brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Roller brake test brake efficiency less than 27.5% overall (1.2.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Both sidelight bulbs not working
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit Very close to limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Upper Bodywork loose but not likely to become unattatched
Offside Front Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Handlebar controls loose to the point of effecting control
Rear Tyre not mounted correctly, not sat on bead
Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Front mudguard missing.
Offside Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Handlebar grip insecure to handlebar (2.2.1 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Front mudguard missing.
Offside Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
How Reliable is the Peugeot Kisbee?
Based on 15,126 MOT tests across 3,447 vehicles.
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KF17 NWU is a 2017 Peugeot Kisbee in Black with a 49cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 5 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2017 Peugeot Kisbee models, the average MOT pass rate is 83.6% with a typical mileage of 9,033 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The Peugeot Kisbee typically stays on UK roads for around 16 years. At 9 years old, this Peugeot Kisbee is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KF17 NWU?
You can check the full history of KF17 NWU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KF17 NWU registered?
KF17 NWU is a 2017 Peugeot Kisbee, first registered on 21 August 2017.
Is KF17 NWU safe to buy?
The MOT history for KF17 NWU shows 5 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KF17 NWU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KF17 NWU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.