MOT Status
ValidMileage
110,456 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Bonnet stay missing/hinge broken
Brake pedal wearing smooth anti-slip rubber worn on edge (1.1.2 (c))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Load space wood lined obscuring some prescribed areas
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn off on inside edge. Dangerous Condition (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing 2010 y o m (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn off on inside edge. Dangerous Condition (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever defective but can be satisfactorily operated high travel (1.1.6 (d))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Lower Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both (5.3.2 (c))
Spare tyre defective Close too limit & outer side wall badly perished/split ()
Emissions unable to be completed engine oil level below min. mark, may cause damage when tested (8.2.2.2 (e))
Nearside Front Hydraulic brake calliper leaking at joint with hose (1.1.16 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Windscreen wiper not working (3.4 (a))
Offside Windscreen wiper blade missing (3.4 (b) (ii))
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Brake hose connection leaking on a hydraulic braking system with caliper (1.1.12 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Bonnet stay missing/hinge broken
Brake pedal wearing smooth anti-slip rubber worn on edge (1.1.2 (c))
Driver's view Items removed from driver's view prior to test (3.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Load space wood lined obscuring some prescribed areas
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn off on inside edge. Dangerous Condition (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing 2010 y o m (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn off on inside edge. Dangerous Condition (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine oil level below min. mark prior to test (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever defective but can be satisfactorily operated high travel (1.1.6 (d))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Spare tyre defective split outer side wall & pressure low/flat, not fully secured ()
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Oil leaking excessively from engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Sump damaged
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Coil spring corroded Nearside & Offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective Front flexi clamp loose but exhaust still secure (6.1.2 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Headlamp mount damaged but not insecure
Rear Coil spring corroded Nearside & Offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective worn still clear (3.4 (b) (i))
Power steering pipe/hose has slight seepage (2.1.5 (a))
Spare tyre defective ()
exhauts clap missing back box to centre section
185/65/R15/88H & T. Fronts 2mm. Rears 6mm.
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Wearing inner edge. (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Wearing inner edge. (5.2.3 (e))
185/65/R15/88H & T. Fronts 2mm. Rears 6mm.
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Wearing inner edge. (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Wearing inner edge. (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamps Replaced 501 bulb. (4.7.2 (a))
185/65/R15/92H. OF 5 OR 3 NR 6 NF 5mm.
185/65/R15/92H. Fronts 5mm. Rears 3mm.
Tyre worn close to the legal limit Fronts wearing inner edges, ensure they are monitored. (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
185/65/R15/92H. Fronts 5mm. Rears 3mm.
Tyre worn close to the legal limit Fronts wearing inner edges, ensure they are monitored. (4.1.E.1)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit strong advice (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit strong advice (4.1.E.1)
185/65/R15/88T. OF 6 OR 4 NR 3 NF 6mm.
Re-shapped heatshield.
How Reliable is the Citroen Nemo?
Based on 279,608 MOT tests across 21,949 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KM11 YRA is a 2011 Citroen Nemo in White with a 1,248cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.8%.
Across all 2011 Citroen Nemo models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.3% with a typical mileage of 71,768 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Citroen Nemo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,767 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KM11 YRA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen Nemo typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 15 years old, this Citroen Nemo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KM11 YRA?
You can check the full history of KM11 YRA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KM11 YRA registered?
KM11 YRA is a 2011 Citroen Nemo, first registered on 27 June 2011.
Is KM11 YRA safe to buy?
The MOT history for KM11 YRA shows 16 tests with a 68.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KM11 YRA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KM11 YRA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.