MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
123,563 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Coil spring mounting corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake pipe slightly corroded n/s and o/s (3.6.B.2c)
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement n/s and o/s [rear] (2.4.G.2)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded n/s and o/s (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Inner brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened n/s and o/s (3.5.1i)
engine covers and undertrays fitted obscuring some components
slight corrosion on suspension components
Offside Rear coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Front Brake pipe slightly corroded n/s and o/s (3.6.B.2c)
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement n/s and o/s [rear] (2.4.G.2)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded n/s and o/s (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Inner brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened n/s and o/s (3.5.1i)
engine covers and undertrays fitted obscuring some components
slight corrosion on suspension components
Brake pipe slightly corroded both front to rear (3.6.B.2c)
Front Brake pipe slightly corroded n/s and o/s (3.6.B.2c)
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured n/s and o/s (1.4.A.2f)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Offside Rear Outer tyre wearing thin
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened n/s and o/s (3.5.1i)
corrosion on suspension components
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both sides (1.4.A.2f)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
engine cover and under tray fitted obscuring some components
rear exhaust box slightly deteriorated
tow hitch removed
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Tow ball/hitch not fitted at time of test
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
n/s/r tyre slightly out of shape on outer edge
rear exhaust box slightly deteriorated
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
Steering column top bearing slightly worn (2.1.2c)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
Steering column top bearing slightly worn (2.1.2c)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Rover 75?
Based on 1,365,354 MOT tests across 103,127 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KN53 LVE is a 2003 Rover 75 in Silver with a 1,951cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80%.
Across all 2003 Rover 75 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.3% with a typical mileage of 68,100 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 75 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 82,341 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KN53 LVE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 75 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 23 years old, this Rover 75 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KN53 LVE?
You can check the full history of KN53 LVE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KN53 LVE registered?
KN53 LVE is a 2003 Rover 75, first registered on 29 September 2003.
Is KN53 LVE safe to buy?
The MOT history for KN53 LVE shows 20 tests with a 80% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KN53 LVE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KN53 LVE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.