MOT Status
ValidMileage
135,386 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Electronic stability control warning lamp indicates a fault (7.12 (e))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement and hydraulic piston damp (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective just clearing (3.4 (b) (i))
Anti-roll bar attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced o/s & n/s rear anti-roll bar axle & chassis. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule o/s & n/s rear (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened o/s & n/s rear lower axle brackets (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Intermediate & rear body mountings corroded
Rear axle has heavy surface corrosion.
Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced Rear panard arm mounting on axle (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced Rear panard arm mounting on chassis. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced rear tie bars, axle & chassis mounting points. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened o/s & n/s front lower (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened o/s & n/s rear upper tie bars (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive o/s & n/s rear upper chassis mounting plates (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced o/s & n/s rear chassis section (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced rear crossmember (6.1.1 (c) (i))
n/s/r anti-roll hydraulic leak
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Hydraulic leak, but not excessive Anti-Roll Bar (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Axle Corroded
Rear Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security Both Rear Body Mounts (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Rear Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both Shock Mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Anti-Roll Bar mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area damaged but not considered excessive Spring Mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Upper Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Crossmember (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp aim too low Both (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Hydraulic leak, but not excessive Anti-Roll Bar (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Axle Corroded
Rear Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security Both Rear Body Mounts (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Rear Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both Shock Mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Anti-Roll Bar mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area damaged but not considered excessive Spring Mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Upper Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Crossmember (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Rear Lower Suspension rod mounting modified but not seriously weakened Offside and Nearside (5.3.3 (c) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Crossmember (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Suspension rod corroded but not seriously weakened panard (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension rod attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced bracket on rear axle (5.3.3 (b) (i))
o/s & n/s rear tyres 3-4000 miles
Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement o/s & n/s front outer (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake feels to be binding
Nearside Rear Brake feels to be binding
Offside Front Brake feels to be binding
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Centre Front Lower Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching by more than 10mm within zone 'A' (8.3.1b)
How Reliable is the Toyota Landcruiser Estate?
Based on 33,877 MOT tests across 2,144 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KR59 KWF is a 2009 Toyota Landcruiser Estate in Black with a 2,982cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 82.4%.
Across all 2009 Toyota Landcruiser Estate models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.7% with a typical mileage of 82,981 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota Landcruiser Estate fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 655 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KR59 KWF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Landcruiser Estate typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 17 years old, this Toyota Landcruiser Estate is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KR59 KWF?
You can check the full history of KR59 KWF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KR59 KWF registered?
KR59 KWF is a 2009 Toyota Landcruiser Estate, first registered on 23 December 2009.
Is KR59 KWF safe to buy?
The MOT history for KR59 KWF shows 17 tests with a 82.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KR59 KWF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KR59 KWF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.