MOT Status
ValidMileage
210,207 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
chips in screen
nearside rear tyre worn on outer edge
chips in screen
chips in screen
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
chips in screen
Central Front Driver's view to the front outside the swept area of the windscreen wipers restricted by an obstruction chip (3.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement back one (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front one (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread split (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement back one (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front one (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread split/cracked (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread split (0.1 (b))
Front Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Outer seat belt is slow to return
Nearside Front Seat belt buckle slightly damaged (7.1.2 (d))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front door check strap snapped off
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement lower arm front bush split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement lower arm front bush split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Oil leak ()
Front number plate split
Nearside Front Lower Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended split (2.4.F.3)
Offside Front Lower Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended split (2.4.F.3)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit low inner and outer (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Valve stem slightly damaged splitting (4.1.D.1e)
Rear Outer both rear tyres side wall damage
Front Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' small chip (8.3.1a)
Offside Rear tyre going bald on outer edge
both off side wheels binding alittle
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. at 13% (3.7.B.5b)
Front oil leck from oil level sensor
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread split (6.3.1d)
Front worn and cracking
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement bush started to crack (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush bush spliting (2.7.4)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement bush started to crack (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush bush spliting (2.7.4)
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. at 17% (3.7.B.5b)
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. at 13% (3.7.B.5b)
Front oil leck from oil level sensor
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread split (6.3.1d)
Front worn and cracking
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement bush started to crack (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush bush spliting (2.7.4)
Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement bush started to crack (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush bush spliting (2.7.4)
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. at 17% (3.7.B.5b)
both off side wheels binding alittle
How Reliable is the Mercedes-benz Vito?
Based on 2,011,702 MOT tests across 164,434 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KR62 WUP is a 2012 Mercedes-benz Vito in White with a 2,143cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 13 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 84.6%.
Across all 2012 Mercedes-benz Vito models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.3% with a typical mileage of 113,200 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mercedes-benz Vito fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 49,564 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KR62 WUP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mercedes-benz Vito typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 14 years old, this Mercedes-benz Vito is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KR62 WUP?
You can check the full history of KR62 WUP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KR62 WUP registered?
KR62 WUP is a 2012 Mercedes-benz Vito, first registered on 24 December 2012.
Is KR62 WUP safe to buy?
The MOT history for KR62 WUP shows 13 tests with a 84.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KR62 WUP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KR62 WUP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.