MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
160,115 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement in the upper support bearing assembly both (2.5.B.1b)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Obligatory mirror insecure both (8.1.1)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded both outer sills (5.2.6)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test rear ()
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (3.5.1i)
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.4.G.2)
Near side step rearend cap missing
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened scored (3.5.1i)
Oil leak ()
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated anchor pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement all bushes (2.4.B.2)
Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both rear mount chassis areas (2.4.A.3)
offside side step front end cap missing
Front registration plate delaminated (6.3.1d)
Nearside Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.4.G.2)
Near side step rearend cap missing
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened scored (3.5.1i)
Oil leak ()
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated anchor pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement all bushes (2.4.B.2)
Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both rear mount chassis areas (2.4.A.3)
offside side step front end cap missing
BRAKE FLUID LOW
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread AND DAMAGED (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Outer Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
OIL LEAK
Rear 3RD ROW SEATS NOT FITTED AT TIME OF TEST
BRAKE FLUID LOW
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread AND DAMAGED (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Outer Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working SIDELIGHT (1.1.A.3b)
OIL LEAK
Offside Front Front position lamp(s) not working SIDELIGHT (1.1.A.3b)
Rear 3RD ROW SEATS NOT FITTED AT TIME OF TEST
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
o/s/r tyre near to limit of wear and very worn on in ner edge
some front brake judder evident
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
o/s/r tyre near to limit of wear and very worn on in ner edge
some front brake judder evident
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside tyre worn on outer edge
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside front tyre worn on inner edge
Nearside Front Seat belt has a cut which has significantly weakened the webbing (5.2.2a)
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
front inner discs corroded
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
front inner discs corroded
Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Front Windscreen has damage to the swept area in excess of a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KS53 JNN is a 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Silver with a 2,499cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 55%.
Across all 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.6% with a typical mileage of 89,579 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KS53 JNN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KS53 JNN?
You can check the full history of KS53 JNN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KS53 JNN registered?
KS53 JNN is a 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 9 December 2003.
Is KS53 JNN safe to buy?
The MOT history for KS53 JNN shows 20 tests with a 55% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KS53 JNN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KS53 JNN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.