MOT Status
ValidMileage
61,553 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement Rear suspension Paralever pivot bearings have slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Very close to limit (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement Rear suspension Paralever pivot bearings have slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Very close to limit (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement Rear swinging arm paralever bearings have slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Rear Inner Brake lining(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear brake fluid very close to minimum level
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Footrest insecure retaining circlip missing (6.2.12 (a))
Nearside Rear Footrest insecure retaining circlip missing (6.2.12 (a))
Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps intermittent (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Rear reflector missing (4.8.2 (a) (ii))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Registration plate illumination bulb not working. Rear tyre profile is very flat
Rear Brake pad(s) (sintered type) less than 1.0mm thick (3.2A1f(ii))
Registration plate illumination bulb not working. Rear tyre profile is very flat
Front Brake lever mounting insecure (3.1.2a)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Headlamp incorrect colour (1.2.1)
Nearside Handlebar handgrip not secure to handlebars. (2.1.1c)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly pitted (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Centre Rear Lower Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Registration plate margin less than the minimum requirement (6.3.4g)
Centre Rear Lower Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
How Reliable is the BMW R1150?
Based on 51,143 MOT tests across 3,967 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KU02 EUX is a 2002 BMW R1150 in Black with a 1,130cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.9%.
Across all 2002 BMW R1150 models, the average MOT pass rate is 90.6% with a typical mileage of 29,028 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a BMW R1150 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 623 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KU02 EUX, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The BMW R1150 typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 24 years old, this BMW R1150 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KU02 EUX?
You can check the full history of KU02 EUX by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KU02 EUX registered?
KU02 EUX is a 2002 BMW R1150, first registered on 1 March 2002.
Is KU02 EUX safe to buy?
The MOT history for KU02 EUX shows 21 tests with a 61.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KU02 EUX have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KU02 EUX. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.