MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
134,062 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coil spring corroded Both front (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Inner sills corroded.
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Outer sills corroded and nearside rear has a hole.
Offside Obligatory mirror missing (3.3 (a))
Coil spring corroded Both front (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Inner sills corroded.
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Outer sills corroded and nearside rear has a hole.
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Both rear (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
rear of sills a bit corroded
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded from hose to wheel (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded into hose (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded from hose to wheel (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded into hose (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material into hose (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Both rear tyres perished.
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both front into hoses. (1.1.11 (c))
Rear sills corroded.
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front on inner edges. (5.2.3 (e))
Both rear tyres perished.
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both front into hoses. (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear sills corroded.
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front on inner edges. (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside rear outer sill corroded.
Nearside rear tyre cracked between tread and on outer sidewall.
Offside rear tyre cracked between tread.
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded into hose (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit worn on inner edge and cracking in trend and on edges (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded into hose (3.6.B.2c)
Both front tyres wearing on inner edges.
Exhaust corroded.
Offside front tyre fitted wrong rotation.
Both front tyres wearing on inner edges.
Exhaust corroded.
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside front tyre fitted wrong rotation.
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded from hose (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded from hose (3.6.B.2c)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Supplementary Restraint System warning lamp indicates a fault (5.4.2)
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 27% (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded to hose (3.6.B.2c)
centre and rear exhaust sections in poor condition
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
offside front tyre getting low on the inside edge.
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
offside rear tyre,deteriorated between tread area
n/s/f tyre is slighty worn on inner edge
Nearside Rear Rear position lamp(s) not in a clean condition but function not impaired (1.1.4a)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low when the centre of the headlamp is below 850mm from the ground (1.6.B2)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
How Reliable is the Rover 25?
Based on 1,784,341 MOT tests across 157,261 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KU02 VUR is a 2002 Rover 25 in Green with a 1,994cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 28 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.3%.
Across all 2002 Rover 25 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.3% with a typical mileage of 50,970 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Rover 25 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 69,670 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KU02 VUR, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 25 typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 24 years old, this Rover 25 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KU02 VUR?
You can check the full history of KU02 VUR by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KU02 VUR registered?
KU02 VUR is a 2002 Rover 25, first registered on 27 March 2002.
Is KU02 VUR safe to buy?
The MOT history for KU02 VUR shows 28 tests with a 64.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KU02 VUR have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KU02 VUR. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.