MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
142,477 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Oil leak, but not excessive ENGINE OIL (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Central Rear Lower Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower NON-OBLIGATORY FOG LAMP LENS DAMAGED
Nearside Front Lower OIL COOLER PIPES HEAVILY CORRODED AT JOINTS WITH TRANSMISSION
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower REAR SILENCER BOX CORRODED/IN POOR CONDITION
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing CASING HEAVILY CORRODED (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing CASING HEAVILY CORRODED (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Nearside Rear Lower REAR SILENCER BOX CORRODED/IN POOR CONDITION
Central Rear Lower Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower NON-OBLIGATORY FOG LAMP LENS DAMAGED
Nearside Front Lower OIL COOLER PIPES HEAVILY CORRODED AT JOINTS WITH TRANSMISSION
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing CASING HEAVILY CORRODED (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing CASING HEAVILY CORRODED (5.3.2 (b))
Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Inner wheel arch (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Inner wheel arch (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust silencer deteriorated
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Inner wheel arch (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Inner wheel arch (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust silencer deteriorated
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
HEADLAMP LENSES CLOUDY - POOR BEAM IMAGES
O/S/R TYRE OUTER SIDE WALL PERISHED
Oil leak, but not excessive AROUND SUMP (8.4.1 (a) (i))
HEADLAMP LENSES CLOUDY - POOR BEAM IMAGES
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt GAITOR SPLIT (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
O/S/R TYRE OUTER SIDE WALL PERISHED
Oil leak, but not excessive AROUND SUMP (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Outer pin bearing (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust silencer deteriorated
EXHAUST SYSTEM CORRODED
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front engine mounting deteriorated, but not resulting in excessive movement (6.1.D.1a)
Nearside Outer Rear Upper Tie bar/rod has slight play in a pin bearing (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
n/s/f seat belt cords slightly fraying
ADVISE REPLACEMENT OF FRONT No PLATE
Nearside Front Seat belt stitching slightly frayed (5.2.2b)
How Reliable is the Saab 9-5?
Based on 735,114 MOT tests across 55,671 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KU52 UJK is a 2002 Saab 9-5 in Silver with a 2,290cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 85%.
Across all 2002 Saab 9-5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.0% with a typical mileage of 97,878 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Saab 9-5 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 28,935 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KU52 UJK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Saab 9-5 typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Saab 9-5 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KU52 UJK?
You can check the full history of KU52 UJK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KU52 UJK registered?
KU52 UJK is a 2002 Saab 9-5, first registered on 4 September 2002.
Is KU52 UJK safe to buy?
The MOT history for KU52 UJK shows 20 tests with a 85% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KU52 UJK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KU52 UJK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.