MOT Status
ValidMileage
161,454 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Rear Inner Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords wall (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Inner Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords wall (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Central Rear Seat belt not functioning as intended (7.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt split (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt split (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective deteriorated (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint has slight play upper attachment has slight sideways movement (nut loose) (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective deteriorated (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin 2mm (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin 2mm (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
HEADLIGHT GLASS PITTED
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin inner and outer. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Outer Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin inner and outer. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Outer seat belt slow to return.
Offside Front Upper Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material near inner wheel spat. (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Outer Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Exhaust emissions exceed manufacturer's specified limit TEST ON LIMIT 1.33. (8.2.2.2 (a))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear of wishbone arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Outer Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn upper pin /bush. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear of wishbone arm. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin inner and outer. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Outer Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin inner and outer. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Outer seat belt slow to return.
Offside Front Upper Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material near inner wheel spat. (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Outer Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Inner Brake pipe slightly corroded Near wheel arch cover. (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front seat belt retect,s slowly.
Nearside Front Lower Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt droplink cover. (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Inner Brake pipe slightly corroded Near wheel arch cover. (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front seat belt retect,s slowly.
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Brake pedal anti-slip provision incomplete (3.3.A.1b)
Brake pedal anti-slip provision worn smooth (3.3.A.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Front Obligatory mirror seriously damaged, affecting the rear view (8.1.2a)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Rover 75?
Based on 1,365,354 MOT tests across 103,127 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KU53 UMG is a 2003 Rover 75 in Green with a 1,951cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 29 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.5%.
Across all 2003 Rover 75 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.3% with a typical mileage of 68,100 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Rover 75 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 82,341 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KU53 UMG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 75 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 23 years old, this Rover 75 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KU53 UMG?
You can check the full history of KU53 UMG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KU53 UMG registered?
KU53 UMG is a 2003 Rover 75, first registered on 2 September 2003.
Is KU53 UMG safe to buy?
The MOT history for KU53 UMG shows 29 tests with a 65.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KU53 UMG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KU53 UMG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.