MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
125,464 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Oil leak, but not excessive differential oil seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front bumper corner loose
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Offside Parking (secondary brake) on a single line braking system has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.3.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front bumper corner loose
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Oil leak, but not excessive differential oil seal (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
front prop shaft rubber mount deteriorating
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Exhaust system insecure front and center exhaust clamps missing (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Offside Rear Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Offside Rear Parking (secondary brake) on a single line braking system has inadequate effort at a wheel (1.3.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
front prop shaft rubber mount deteriorating
Front Tyre obviously under inflated both front (5.2.3 (l))
Front prop shaft rubber mounting splitting
Offside Front Nail in tyre ()
Offside Rear parking brake just met requirements
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both rear tyres (5.2.3 (e))
underside of vehicle coverd in dried mud cannot see condition of vehicle body and some suspension components
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
both front suspension arm bushes slightly deteriorating
both rear differential rubber mounts deteriorating and worn
tensioner bearing on auxiliary loose
Brake pad(s) wear indicator illuminated (1.1.13 (a) (i))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Offside Parking (secondary brake) on a single line braking system has inadequate effort at a wheel (1.3.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
both front suspension arm bushes slightly deteriorating
both rear differential rubber mounts deteriorating and worn
tensioner bearing on auxiliary loose
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both o/s/f and n/s/f, front bushes (2.4.G.2)
both rear differential mounting bushes deteriorating
front tyres are wearing unevenly due to wheel alignment fault 205/65/16
Horn sounds harsh or grating (1.6.2e)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Offside Rear rear parking (secondary) brake grabbing slightly (3.7.B.6b)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both o/s/f and n/s/f, front bushes (2.4.G.2)
both rear differential mounting bushes deteriorating
front tyres are wearing unevenly due to wheel alignment fault 205/65/16
Supplementary Restraint System warning lamp indicates a fault (5.4.2)
Brake hydraulic reservoir fluid close to minimum level (3.6.G.1b)
both front suspension arms front oil filled bushes damp with oil
nearside front daytime running lamp not working
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both blades (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm and cut to cord (4.1.E.1) DANGEROUS
both front suspension arms front oil filled bushes damp with oil
nearside front daytime running lamp not working
nearside rear tyre worn
nearside wiper smearing
How Reliable is the Mercedes-benz Vito?
Based on 2,011,702 MOT tests across 164,434 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KU61 LYF is a 2011 Mercedes-benz Vito in White with a 2,148cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2011 Mercedes-benz Vito models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.8% with a typical mileage of 119,633 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mercedes-benz Vito fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 49,564 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KU61 LYF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mercedes-benz Vito typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 15 years old, this Mercedes-benz Vito is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KU61 LYF?
You can check the full history of KU61 LYF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KU61 LYF registered?
KU61 LYF is a 2011 Mercedes-benz Vito, first registered on 30 September 2011.
Is KU61 LYF safe to buy?
The MOT history for KU61 LYF shows 15 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KU61 LYF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KU61 LYF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.