MOT Status
ValidMileage
289,913 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush excessively worn rear axle (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Front Position lamp not working both sides (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Front Registration plate insecure (0.1 (a))
Offside Front Brake hose excessively damaged (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Rear reflector missing (4.8.2 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Fog lamp not working
Central Front Front numberplate cracked/damaged but still readable
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Central Front Front numberplate cracked/damaged but still readable
Brake pedal wearing smooth RUBBER (1.1.2 (c))
Front Inner BOTH WHEEL ARCH TRIMS DAMAGED AND NOT SECURE
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge LOW ON EDGE 2.8MM (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside REVERSING LIGHT NOT WORKING
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge LOW ON EDGE 2.2MM (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened PITTED SUGGEST REPLACEMENT (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn FRONT (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn FRONT (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth RUBBER (1.1.2 (c))
Front Inner BOTH WHEEL ARCH TRIMS DAMAGED AND NOT SECURE
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge LOW ON EDGE 2.8MM (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside REVERSING LIGHT NOT WORKING
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge LOW ON EDGE 2.2MM (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened PITTED SUGGEST REPLACEMENT (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth RUBBER (1.1.2 (c))
Front Inner WHEEL ARCH TRIMS DAMAGED BOTH SIDES
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement FRONT (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement FRONT (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened PITTED (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel HANDBRAKE (1.1.2 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake pedal wearing smooth RUBBER (1.1.2 (c))
Front Inner WHEEL ARCH TRIMS DAMAGED BOTH SIDES
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement FRONT (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Offside Front BRAKE PADS LOWER THAN NEARSIDE
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened SCORED (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement FRONT (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened PITTED (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Worn and corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge On 2.8mm and worn on the inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Very little reserve travel on handbrake
n/s/f plastic inner wing liner is damaged, insecure and in poor condition
o/s/f plastic inner wing liner is damaged,insecure and in poor condition
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Worn and corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Nearside Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge On 2.8mm and worn on the inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Very little reserve travel on handbrake
n/s/f plastic inner wing liner is damaged, insecure and in poor condition
o/s/f plastic inner wing liner is damaged,insecure and in poor condition
Brake pedal wearing smooth RUBBER (1.1.2 (c))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Nearside Rear TYRE 2.7MM
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Nearside Rear TYRE 3.4MM
PEDAL RUBBER WORN
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Nearside Rear TYRE 3.4MM
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper blade missing (8.2.2)
PEDAL RUBBER WORN
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement FRONT (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear JACKING BLOCK MISSING
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre CLOSE TO EDGE ()
Offside Front TYRE WEARING ON EDGE
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
imisions to clean to register
How Reliable is the Mercedes-benz Vito?
Based on 2,011,702 MOT tests across 164,434 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KU62 FBV is a 2012 Mercedes-benz Vito in White with a 2,151cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.1%.
Across all 2012 Mercedes-benz Vito models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.3% with a typical mileage of 113,200 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mercedes-benz Vito fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 49,564 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KU62 FBV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mercedes-benz Vito typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 14 years old, this Mercedes-benz Vito is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KU62 FBV?
You can check the full history of KU62 FBV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KU62 FBV registered?
KU62 FBV is a 2012 Mercedes-benz Vito, first registered on 1 September 2012.
Is KU62 FBV safe to buy?
The MOT history for KU62 FBV shows 18 tests with a 61.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KU62 FBV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KU62 FBV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.