MOT Status
ValidMileage
263,455 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
rear axle corroded
Front Oil leak, but not excessive from engine close to limit (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush deteriorating (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded both n/s and o/s (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Upper Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Upper Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn (5.1.2 (b) (i))
front seat belts starting to fray
rear axle upper arm bushes worn
rear drop link rubbers perished
tow bar very rusty
windscreen chipped
Nearside Rear Position lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp affected by brake light (4.2.3 (c))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced chassis corroded at suspension arm mounting point (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced chassis corroded by suspension arm mounting point (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint likely to become detached (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
front brakes worn
front seat belts starting to fray
rear axle upper arm bushes worn
rear drop link rubbers perished
tow bar very rusty
windscreen chipped
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Seat belt slightly damaged o/s & n/s slight fraying (7.1.2 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view small chip n/s (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Steering rack insecure to the extent there is excessive movement at the mountings mounting D bush worn leading to excessive movement (2.1.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Prop shaft joint worn, but not excessively rear u/joint (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Seat belt slightly damaged o/s & n/s slight fraying (7.1.2 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Offside Rear Nail in tyre has 2 nails [1 close to inner shoulder] 265/70/16 112 H M&S ] ()
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources 1of 2 (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view small chip n/s (3.2 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp not working o/s (1.1.C.1d)
Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement o/s front roll bar link broken (2.4.G.2) DANGEROUS
n/s front roll bar link top rubbers perished
coolant leak on pipe to rear heater
hand brake poor o/s rear
n/s front drive shaft seal leaking
n/s rear radius arm front bush poor
some play in brake pedal pivot
wear to front brake pads
wear to n/s/f tyre on edges
damage to front no plate
play to steering rack mounting bushes
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Toyota Land Cruiser?
Based on 446,391 MOT tests across 36,084 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KV52 UYB is a 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser in Black with a 2,982cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 87%.
Across all 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.9% with a typical mileage of 111,837 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota Land Cruiser fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 10,265 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KV52 UYB, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Land Cruiser typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 24 years old, this Toyota Land Cruiser is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KV52 UYB?
You can check the full history of KV52 UYB by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KV52 UYB registered?
KV52 UYB is a 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser, first registered on 30 September 2002.
Is KV52 UYB safe to buy?
The MOT history for KV52 UYB shows 23 tests with a 87% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KV52 UYB have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KV52 UYB. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.