MOT Status
ValidMileage
129,032 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn both rear axle bush's worn (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view small chip top right (3.2 (a) (i))
Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn Rear axle bushes worn (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded All springs (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Window damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Slight power steering fluid leak from rack.
Front tyres worn on edges.
Front Coil spring corroded NS & OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Inner sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Coil spring corroded NS & OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Cracked and perished (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Front Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Front Steering system slightly rough (2.1.1 (a))
Centre exhaust section corroding.
Front brake discs lipped.
Nsf tyre worn on outer edge + nail in tread.
Headlamp lenses deteriorating.
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside front brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
nearside C V boot perish cracking in areas
nearside rear tyre has edge wear
offside rear tyre perish cracking at inside rim join areas
Supplementary Restraint System warning lamp indicates a fault (5.4.2)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside front brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
nearside C V boot perish cracking in areas
nearside rear tyre has edge wear
offside rear tyre perish cracking at inside rim join areas
rear brakes imbalance is 28%
SRS light lit on dashboard
auxilary drive belt cracking
both sides rear tyres 3mm tread depths
nearside front tyre devoid of tread on outer tips of shoulders, and 2mm tread depth
offside front tyre worn shoulders
parking brake lever as long travel, but as some reserve travel left
How Reliable is the Rover 25?
Based on 1,784,341 MOT tests across 157,261 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KX56 KXM is a 2006 Rover 25 in Blue with a 1,994cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 85%.
Across all 2006 Rover 25 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.5% with a typical mileage of 41,526 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 25 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 69,670 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KX56 KXM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 25 typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 20 years old, this Rover 25 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KX56 KXM?
You can check the full history of KX56 KXM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KX56 KXM registered?
KX56 KXM is a 2006 Rover 25, first registered on 15 September 2006.
Is KX56 KXM safe to buy?
The MOT history for KX56 KXM shows 20 tests with a 85% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KX56 KXM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KX56 KXM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.