MOT Status
ValidMileage
158,866 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view crack (3.2 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view crack (3.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Offside Front wing corroded
Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front wing corroded
Offside Rear Outer Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Central Rear Exhaust mounting defective System secure (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Track arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Corrosion to wheel arch
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective System secure (6.1.2 (a))
Surface corrosion to steering, suspension and brake components
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Coil spring corroded Both nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective System secure (6.1.2 (a))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective System secure (6.1.2 (a))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Headlamps aged
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Exhaust hanger failed due to corrosion but system secure
Both headlamps aged and images poor
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Exhaust hanger adrift but system secure
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear exhaust hanger adrift but system secure
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Steering rack gaiter insecure (2.2.D.2d)
Offside Front Tyre low/wearing inner edge
Offside Rear Devoid of tread inner edge
Rear Rear exhaust hanger adrift but system secure
Nearside front and offside front tyres low inner edges
Steering,suspension and brake components showing general age and wear
Stone damage and cuts to treads
Surface corrosion to exhaust in parts
Tyres showing age and perishment
Various covers and undertrays restricting views
Wet Test
Nail in nearside front tyre
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Stone damage to treads
Various covers and undertrays restricting views
Wet Test
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nail in nearside front tyre
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside rear and offside rear tyres devoid of tread inner edges
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Stone damage to treads
Various covers and undertrays restricting views
Wet Test
Rear tyres have low inner edge tread depths
Tyres have stepped tread design
Various covers and undertrays restricting views
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside rear and offside rear tyres low inner and outer edges (Stepped Tread Design)
front brake pads wearing very low discs ridged and worn recommend soon
Child seats fitted offside and nearside rear.
Nearside and offside front tyres perishing.
Nearside and offside rear tyres low tread.
Various covers and undertrays restricting views.
Child seat fitted offside rear.
Nearside and offside rear tyres low tread.
Various covers and undertrays fitted.
How Reliable is the Ford Focus C-max?
Based on 1,326,487 MOT tests across 79,932 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LG54 BDZ is a 2004 Ford Focus C-max in Silver with a 1,997cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 82.6%.
Across all 2004 Ford Focus C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.1% with a typical mileage of 75,889 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Focus C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 67,238 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LG54 BDZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Focus C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 22 years old, this Ford Focus C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LG54 BDZ?
You can check the full history of LG54 BDZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LG54 BDZ registered?
LG54 BDZ is a 2004 Ford Focus C-max, first registered on 30 September 2004.
Is LG54 BDZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for LG54 BDZ shows 23 tests with a 82.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LG54 BDZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LG54 BDZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.