MOT Status
ValidMileage
153,924 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
under side of vehicle rusty esp sills and front cross member
Nearside Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
sills rusty
bottom ball joint dust covers in poor condition
front tyres worn on inner edges
offside mirror in poor condition
play in steering rack joints and track rod ends
rear brake pipes rusty
sills rusty
slight engine oil leaks
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
bottom ball joint dust covers in poor condition
front tyres worn on inner edges
offside mirror in poor condition
play in steering rack joints and track rod ends
rear brake pipes rusty
sills rusty
slight engine oil leaks
both front ball joint dust covers heavily perished
nearside headlight aim poor
nearside mirror cover repaired with tape
offside door mirror in poor condition
rear brake pipes rusty
sills rusty
Front Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Rear Bumper damaged and likely to cause injury when grazed or contacted (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Rear fog lamp switch inoperative (4.5.3 (a))
Driver's seat insecure (6.2.5 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Passenger's seat insecure (6.2.6 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
both front ball joint dust covers heavily perished
nearside headlight aim poor
nearside mirror cover repaired with tape
offside door mirror in poor condition
rear brake pipes rusty
sills rusty
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area damaged but not considered excessive outer sill just outside 30cm area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside step holed but not in prescribed area
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside step holed but not in prescribed area
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear bumper corner missing but not sharp
Offside Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear lamp taped up but no white lights showing
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
slight play in both front lower ball joints
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front suspension has slight play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Nearside Lower Front suspension ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front suspension has slight play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside Lower Front suspension ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Oil leak ()
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded both pipes flexi to compensator valve (3.6.B.2c)
bonnet handle broken opened with pliers
engine management lamp on
speedo iluminates but rest of dash dosnt
Light corrosion to suspension components
N/s mirror casing damaged
Slight weap to both front shock absorbers
Some uneven wear to both front tyres
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Both front shocks weaping
Damage to both outer sills
General light corrosion to subframes and suspension components
Some deterioration to suspension ball joint dust covers
Some uneven wear to both front tyres
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Both front shocks weaping
Damage to both outer sills
General light corrosion to subframes and suspension components
Some deterioration to suspension ball joint dust covers
Some uneven wear to both front tyres
Both front shock absorbers weaping
Brake pedal pad worn
Engine oil leaks
Noise from upper steering column
Offside Front position lamp(s) incorrect colour (1.1.A.3e)
Park travel high for model
Some corrosion to both front brake hose ferules
Squeal and grind from rear brakes
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Both front shock absorbers weaping
Brake pedal pad worn
Engine oil leaks
Noise from upper steering column
Park travel high for model
Some corrosion to both front brake hose ferules
Squeal and grind from rear brakes
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)
nearside front tyre worn on inner edge close to legal limit of 1.6mm
offside front tyre worn on inner edge close to legal limit of 1.6mm
Evidence of oil on power steering pipework
Light misting of oil to both front shock absorbers
Small crack front number plate
Some damage to both sills
Some grab on rear brakes
Some inbalance to front brakes
Evidence of oil on power steering pipework
Light misting of oil to both front shock absorbers
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Small crack front number plate
Some damage to both sills
Some grab on rear brakes
Some inbalance to front brakes
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
O/s/f tyre wearing unevenly
Some damage to both sill panels
Some damage to n/s/f crossmenber and chassis end
Some light scoring and corrosion to front discs
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
O/s/f tyre wearing unevenly
Some damage to both sill panels
Some damage to n/s/f crossmenber and chassis end
Some light scoring and corrosion to front discs
How Reliable is the Ldv Maxus 2.8 CDI 95 SWB?
Based on 2,923 MOT tests across 272 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LJ05 APK is a 2005 Ldv Maxus 2.8 CDI 95 SWB in White with a 2,500cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 69.6%.
Across all 2005 Ldv Maxus 2.8 CDI 95 SWB models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.9% with a typical mileage of 78,851 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ldv Maxus 2.8 CDI 95 SWB fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 92 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LJ05 APK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ldv Maxus 2.8 CDI 95 SWB typically stays on UK roads for around 21 years. At 21 years old, this Ldv Maxus 2.8 CDI 95 SWB is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LJ05 APK?
You can check the full history of LJ05 APK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LJ05 APK registered?
LJ05 APK is a 2005 Ldv Maxus 2.8 CDI 95 SWB, first registered on 24 May 2005.
Is LJ05 APK safe to buy?
The MOT history for LJ05 APK shows 23 tests with a 69.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LJ05 APK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LJ05 APK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.