MOT Status
ValidMileage
53,720 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Headlamp aim projected beam image obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Nearside Handlebar grip insecure to handlebar (2.2.1 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Stop lamp does not illuminate by the operation of both brake controls Rear switch not working. (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Front Brake indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamp(s) (4.7.2 (a))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear Swing Arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear Swing Arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamp(s) (4.7.2 (a))
Steering headbearing excessively stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake pedal has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Horn not loud enough to be heard by another road user (1.7.3a)
Headlamp insecure (1.2.3b)
How Reliable is the Cagiva Raptor?
Based on 5,262 MOT tests across 472 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LJ56 UPP is a 2006 Cagiva Raptor in Blue with a 645cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.8%.
Across all 2006 Cagiva Raptor models, the average MOT pass rate is 81.4% with a typical mileage of 9,810 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Cagiva Raptor fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 65 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LJ56 UPP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Cagiva Raptor typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 20 years old, this Cagiva Raptor is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LJ56 UPP?
You can check the full history of LJ56 UPP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LJ56 UPP registered?
LJ56 UPP is a 2006 Cagiva Raptor, first registered on 27 November 2006.
Is LJ56 UPP safe to buy?
The MOT history for LJ56 UPP shows 24 tests with a 70.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LJ56 UPP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LJ56 UPP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.