MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
52,213 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Offside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Front Brake disc(s) excessively worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Rear Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Exhaust mounting deteriorated. (7.1.1.c)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
motorcycle hand warmers fitted in such a way that controls cannot be readily applied
Front Brake cylinder severely corroded (3.2.B1b)
Front Brake lever is bent and the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Nearside Rear Footrest insecure (6.2.1a)
Rear Brake lever is bent and the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre valve stem damaged which could cause sudden tyre deflation (4.1.2c)
Rear shock absorber has inadequate damping effect. (2.4.A.3b)
Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters (6.3.4c)
Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Offside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Exhaust mounting deteriorated. (7.1.1.c)
Front suspension assembly slightly misaligned (2.3.1)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Rear Brake lining(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake lining(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front suspension has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.3.6c)
Nearside Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Offside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Brake lining(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Rear Brake lining(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Brake lining(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Nearside Motorcycle structure slightly damaged (6.1.1a)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Handlebar deformed (2.1.1b)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the steering (2.5.1)
Front mudguard insecure (2.3.7)
Handlebar deformed (2.1.1b)
Steering headbearing has excessive free play (2.2.2)
Steering movement excessively stiff with the weight on the lower bearing (2.2.1a)
Steering movement excessively stiff with the wheel raised (2.2.1b)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the handling (2.5.1)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the steering (2.5.1)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
How Reliable is the Honda SES125?
Based on 38,216 MOT tests across 4,396 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LM53 VTW is a 2003 Honda SES125 in White with a 125cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 55.6%.
Across all 2003 Honda SES125 models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.1% with a typical mileage of 14,879 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda SES125 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 948 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LM53 VTW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda SES125 typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 23 years old, this Honda SES125 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LM53 VTW?
You can check the full history of LM53 VTW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LM53 VTW registered?
LM53 VTW is a 2003 Honda SES125, first registered on 29 December 2003.
Is LM53 VTW safe to buy?
The MOT history for LM53 VTW shows 18 tests with a 55.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LM53 VTW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LM53 VTW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.