MOT Status
ValidMileage
173,444 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both near limit replace soon. (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both near limit replace soon. (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective rear clamp (6.1.2 (a))
Spare tyre defective ()
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
oil around engine
Headlamp lens seriously defective both light very dull (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Upper Macpherson strut mounting damaged and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Exhaust mounting defective rear clamp (6.1.2 (a))
Spare tyre defective ()
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
oil around engine
Central Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front head lamp misting
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge strong advise (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front head lamp misting
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Steering arm modified such that the steering is adversely affected ball end worn (2.1.3 (f) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front head lamp misting
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge strong advise (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front head lamp misting
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp aim not tested (4.1.2 (b))
Nearside Front Headlamp lens seriously defective (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp lens seriously defective (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge x2 front tyres, NSF on 2mm, OSF on 3mm, both worn on inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Tyre is cracking around sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Position lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp x2 lamps slightly affected by hazards operating (4.2.3 (c))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chip in screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced x2 lamps, not showing a beam pattern (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Macpherson strut top bush or bearing has excessive wear or free play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened x2 discs fairly corroded/worn (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge x2 front tyres, NSF on 2mm, OSF on 3mm, both worn on inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Brake flexi retaining clip missing, but rubber seal is enough to keep in place
No engine oil before test
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Tyre is cracking around sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Position lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp x2 lamps slightly affected by hazards operating (4.2.3 (c))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chip in screen (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
exhaust heat shield insecure
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
How Reliable is the Peugeot Bipper?
Based on 381,653 MOT tests across 31,026 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LM62 LKC is a 2012 Peugeot Bipper in White with a 1,248cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2012 Peugeot Bipper models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.5% with a typical mileage of 77,306 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot Bipper fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 5,597 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LM62 LKC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot Bipper typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 14 years old, this Peugeot Bipper is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LM62 LKC?
You can check the full history of LM62 LKC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LM62 LKC registered?
LM62 LKC is a 2012 Peugeot Bipper, first registered on 4 December 2012.
Is LM62 LKC safe to buy?
The MOT history for LM62 LKC shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LM62 LKC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LM62 LKC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.