MOT Status
ValidMileage
133,007 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Covers and Shields fitted
Nearside Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake shoes noisy
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect + Bulb insecure (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect + Bulb insecure (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Covers and Shields fitted
Nearside Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing 185/55R16 + tyre on 3mm (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 185/55R16 Tyre on 1.6mm + worn on edges + cracking and perishing, advise to have replaced (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake shoes noisy
Covers and Shields fitted
Nearside Front Lower Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 185/55R16 + Tyre heavily cracking along edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 185/55R16 Tyre worn to 1.6mm, advised to replace (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Covers and Shields fitted
Nearside Front Lower Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 185/55R16 + Tyre heavily cracking along edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 185/55R16 Tyre worn to 1.6mm, advised to replace (5.2.3 (e))
Covers + Shields Fitted
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Both Sides ()
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Handbrake Travel, Requires Adjustment or Repair
Nearside Front Tyre Slightly Perishing - 195/55/16
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Both Sides (4.1.2 (c))
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Both Sides ()
Covers + Shields Fitted
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Handbrake Travel, Requires Adjustment or Repair
Nearside Front Tyre Slightly Perishing - 195/55/16
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Covers + Shields Fitted
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Sides Slightly Deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Stone Chips (3.2 (a) (i))
Handbrake Slight Travel
N/S/F Tyre Perishing on Outer Sidewall
Offside Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Inner Tie Rod Slight Play ()
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Both Sides (4.1.2 (c))
Covers + Shields Fitted
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Sides Slightly Deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Stone Chips (3.2 (a) (i))
Handbrake Slight Travel
N/S/F Tyre Perishing on Outer Sidewall
Offside Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Inner Tie Rod Slight Play ()
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin both sides (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
stone chips
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Both Sides (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin Both Sides (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Stone Chip (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both sides 1855516 (5.2.3 (e))
covers & shields fitted
Offside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Front suspension has a suspension lower ball joint securing nut loose nut missing (2.5.B.1a) DANGEROUS
How Reliable is the Nissan Note?
Based on 2,716,974 MOT tests across 180,658 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LP59 HKY is a 2010 Nissan Note in Red with a 1,598cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2010 Nissan Note models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.1% with a typical mileage of 57,774 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Note fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 38,645 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LP59 HKY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Note typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 16 years old, this Nissan Note is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LP59 HKY?
You can check the full history of LP59 HKY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LP59 HKY registered?
LP59 HKY is a 2010 Nissan Note, first registered on 29 January 2010.
Is LP59 HKY safe to buy?
The MOT history for LP59 HKY shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LP59 HKY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LP59 HKY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.