MOT Status
ValidMileage
39,491 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Drive chain sprocket worn, but not excessively (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Shock absorber has negligible damping effect and limited/shortened travel, dust seals badly perished (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Stop lamp does not illuminate by the operation of both brake controls (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit and worn unevenly (5.2.3 (e))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Exhaust silencer slightly loose (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Valve stem slightly damaged (5.2.3 (j))
passing light switch worn, function intermittent chain rubbing slightly on swing arm brace
Front Valve stem slightly damaged (5.2.3 (j))
Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamp(s) (4.7.2 (a))
passing light switch worn, function intermittent chain rubbing slightly on swing arm brace
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Front brake binding slightly
Front brake binding slightly
Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Front brake binding slightly
Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Front suspension assembly slightly corroded. (2.3.1)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front position lamp does not illuminate immediately when switched on (1.1.3a)
Offside Front Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Offside Rear Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Roller brake test Neither brake control achieves an efficiency of 25% (3.3.A2b)
Roller brake test No brake control achieves an efficiency of 30%. (3.3.A2a)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Front suspension assembly slightly corroded. (2.3.1)
Offside Front Front suspension assembly slightly corroded. (2.3.1)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Exhaust markings indicating not for road use or similar wording (7.1.4)
Front position lamp does not illuminate immediately when switched on (1.1.3a)
Rear position lamp does not illuminate immediately when it is switched on (1.1.3a)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Rear Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
How Reliable is the Suzuki SV650?
Based on 176,678 MOT tests across 15,165 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LR52 AEO is a 2002 Suzuki SV650 in Purple with a 645cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2002 Suzuki SV650 models, the average MOT pass rate is 85.3% with a typical mileage of 17,300 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki SV650 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 2,801 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LR52 AEO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki SV650 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 24 years old, this Suzuki SV650 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LR52 AEO?
You can check the full history of LR52 AEO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LR52 AEO registered?
LR52 AEO is a 2002 Suzuki SV650, first registered on 21 October 2002.
Is LR52 AEO safe to buy?
The MOT history for LR52 AEO shows 24 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LR52 AEO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LR52 AEO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.