MOT Status
ValidMileage
65,819 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear axle bump stops missing
Nearside Outer sill corroded
Nearside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Outer sill corroded
Offside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar linkage corroded but not seriously weakened offside and nearside (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (0.1 (b))
all four tyres perished and cracked across the tread
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear Other passenger door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle (6.2.3 (a))
Nearside Outer sill corroded
Offside Outer sill corroded
Rear axle bump stops missing
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear outer sill corroded
Offside Rear outer sill corroded
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (0.1 (b))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing all tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
rear axle bump stops missing
Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced both (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Obligatory mirror does not provide a view to the rear will not park correctly (3.3 (c))
Offside Rear Other passenger door does not latch securely closed (6.2.3 (a))
Spare wheel insecure in carrier (6.1.5 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear outer sill corroded
Offside Rear outer sill corroded
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (0.1 (b))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing all tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
rear axle bump stops missing
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Clouded both sides (4.1.4 (b))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (0.1 (b))
spare tyre slightly insecure
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn D BUSH (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn D BUSH (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front fog lamp not working
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in an anchor pin and/or bush Both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Leaf spring has slight wear in an anchor pin and/or bush Rear axle front bushes Both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Clouded both sides (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Upper and lower (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Central Front Lower engine mounting deteriorated, but not resulting in excessive movement (6.1.D.1a)
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Central Front Lower engine mounting deteriorated, but not resulting in excessive movement (6.1.D.1a)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Centre Front Lower engine mounting deteriorated, but not resulting in excessive movement (6.1.D.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Outer tyres both sides perishing
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Centre Front Lower engine mounting deteriorated, but not resulting in excessive movement (6.1.D.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Outer tyres both sides perishing
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Inner Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear tyres both cracking
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Inner Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear tyres both cracking
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Front suspension has slight movement at a wishbone pin or bush (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Front suspension has slight movement at a wishbone pin or bush (2.5.A.1c)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
both rear tyres cracks on wall
spare wheel loose
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
central brake lamp not working
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
central brake lamp not working
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Spare tyre defective
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LR52 DFC is a 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Black with a 3,301cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 30 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.7% with a typical mileage of 92,836 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LR52 DFC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LR52 DFC?
You can check the full history of LR52 DFC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LR52 DFC registered?
LR52 DFC is a 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 1 November 2002.
Is LR52 DFC safe to buy?
The MOT history for LR52 DFC shows 30 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LR52 DFC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LR52 DFC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.