MOT Status
ValidMileage
115,022 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front chassis rail corroded by subframe upper mounting
Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed drivers (7.1.2 (b))
surface cracks and perish marks in tyres
Hazard warning switch inoperative (4.4.2 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front chassis rail corroded by subframe upper mounting
Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed drivers (7.1.2 (b))
surface cracks and perish marks in tyres
Central Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing 175/65 R15 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Upper Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed Close to being considered excessive (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing 175/65 R15 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Upper Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed Close to being considered excessive (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Sub-frame pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Sub-frame pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases Rear silencer to centre pipe connection (6.1.2 (a))
Front Subframe mount worn causing excessive movement in entire lower suspension and steering components on vehicle
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive From Transmission (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Position lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp Offside & Nearside (4.2.3 (c))
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive From Transmission (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Direction indicator incorrect colour and nearside rear (4.4.3 (a))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Offside Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge and nearside front (5.2.3 (e))
Wiper blades splitting at ends
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit NS + OS (4.1.E.1)
n/s/f tyre sidewall cracking
n/s/r tyre sidewall cracking
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Nissan Note?
Based on 2,716,974 MOT tests across 180,658 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LS10 PXD is a 2010 Nissan Note in Beige with a 1,598cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.4%.
Across all 2010 Nissan Note models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.1% with a typical mileage of 57,774 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Note fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 38,645 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LS10 PXD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Note typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 16 years old, this Nissan Note is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LS10 PXD?
You can check the full history of LS10 PXD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LS10 PXD registered?
LS10 PXD is a 2010 Nissan Note, first registered on 22 May 2010.
Is LS10 PXD safe to buy?
The MOT history for LS10 PXD shows 19 tests with a 68.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LS10 PXD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LS10 PXD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.