MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
7,271 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Nearside Front Mirror missing.
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Speedo clock glass broken.
Centre Lower Motorcycle structure excessively corroded (6.1.1a)
Front Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Front Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on main beam (1.2.2a(ii))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Riders seat insecure (6.2.1a)
Nearside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Nearside Front Mirror missing.
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Speedo clock glass broken.
Centre Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
clocks damaged
no left side mirror
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Nearside Front Direction indicator damaged and function impaired (1.5.3a)
Nearside Rear Direction indicator damaged and function impaired (1.5.3a)
Centre Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
clocks damaged
no left side mirror
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Front suspension has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.3.6c)
Front wheel bearings have slight free play (2.3.5b)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Nearside Front Direction indicator damaged but function not impaired (1.5.3a)
Offside Front Direction indicator damaged but function not impaired (1.5.3a)
Offside Rear Direction indicator damaged but function not impaired (1.5.3a)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Throttle operating incorrectly (6.2.1f)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Front suspension has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.3.6c)
Front wheel bearings have slight free play (2.3.5b)
Nearside Front Direction indicator damaged but function not impaired (1.5.3a)
Offside Front Direction indicator damaged but function not impaired (1.5.3a)
Offside Rear Direction indicator damaged but function not impaired (1.5.3a)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Fuel cap sealing washer missing (7.2.2c)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the wheel raised (2.2.1b)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Offside Motorcycle structure slightly damaged (6.1.1a)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Exhaust excessively deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Fuel cap sealing washer missing (7.2.2c)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Riders seat insecure (6.2.1a)
Offside Motorcycle structure slightly damaged (6.1.1a)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Offside Motorcycle structure slightly damaged (6.1.1a)
Headlamp aim not tested (1.6)
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Riders seat insecure (6.2.1a)
Stop lamp missing (1.3.3a)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Nail in rear tyre
Offside Motorcycle structure slightly damaged (6.1.1a)
How Reliable is the Piaggio Vespa?
Based on 355,016 MOT tests across 47,189 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LT52 UVP is a 2002 Piaggio Vespa in Black with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 56.3%.
Across all 2002 Piaggio Vespa models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.8% with a typical mileage of 11,181 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Piaggio Vespa fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 6,210 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LT52 UVP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Piaggio Vespa typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 24 years old, this Piaggio Vespa is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LT52 UVP?
You can check the full history of LT52 UVP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LT52 UVP registered?
LT52 UVP is a 2002 Piaggio Vespa, first registered on 14 October 2002.
Is LT52 UVP safe to buy?
The MOT history for LT52 UVP shows 16 tests with a 56.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LT52 UVP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LT52 UVP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.