MOT Status
ValidMileage
45,457 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Both front top mounts have slight play
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both side (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front top mountings have slight play
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn Rear bush has worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both sides (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area damaged but not considered excessive Floor near suspension mounting points ,both sides (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both wearing on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Front top mountings have slight play
Os outer sill is showing signs of corrosion
Rear Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Floor (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Floor (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Os sill is showing signs of corrosion
Rear Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear suspension top mounts have movement when suspended
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Floor (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Floor (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear shock top mounts have slight play when suspended
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Axle mounting point corroded at inner sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Floor (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Floor (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Os outer sill has underseal at lower part
Rear Coil spring corroded Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear shock top mounts have slight play when suspended
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front shock top mounts have movement when not under load
Os headlamp has condensation
Rear Coil spring corroded Both at base (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp levelling device inoperative Headlamp does not go up or down (4.1.5 (a))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front shock top mounts have movement when not under load
Os headlamp has condensation
Rear Coil spring corroded Both at base (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Macpherson strut pin or bush excessively worn strut top mount (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp levelling device inoperative (4.1.5 (a))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre in outer shoulder ()
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
front and rear suspension top mounts have movement
o\s front head light has moister in it
rear springs corroded at base
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear o\s rear sill corroded
front and rear suspension top mounts have movement
o\s front head light has moister in it
rear springs corroded at base
Front and rear suspension top mounts have movement
Slightly rusty on OSR sill
Offside Front Driver's seat fore and aft adjustment mechanism not functioning as intended. (6.2.5 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Front and rear suspension top mounts have movement
Os headlamp bulb not fitted correctly
Front suspension upper shock mount has movement
Rear shock absorber upper mounts have movement
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LT58 LGA is a 2008 Ford Ka in Silver with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.7%.
Across all 2008 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 41,756 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LT58 LGA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 18 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LT58 LGA?
You can check the full history of LT58 LGA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LT58 LGA registered?
LT58 LGA is a 2008 Ford Ka, first registered on 29 September 2008.
Is LT58 LGA safe to buy?
The MOT history for LT58 LGA shows 22 tests with a 72.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LT58 LGA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LT58 LGA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.