MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
87,833 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides (2.4.A.3)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides corrosion (2.4.A.3)
Front Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Front coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside Front cut side wall
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area modified, but not inappropriately inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive axle mount to floor (2.4.A.3)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive floor both sides (2.4.A.3)
both sills covers fitted corrosion both outer sills
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides (2.4.A.3)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides corrosion (2.4.A.3)
Front Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Front coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside Front cut side wall
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area modified, but not inappropriately inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive axle mount to floor (2.4.A.3)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive floor both sides (2.4.A.3)
both sills covers fitted corrosion both outer sills
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Offside Front Inner Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded seat mounting (seat belt attached) (5.2.6)
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded by flexi pipe (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner cill and chassis near axle mounting (2.4.A.3)
Rear Trailing arm has excessive play in a pin/bush both (2.4.G.2)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
fully undersealed under car and sideskirts fitted
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Nearside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
both front tyre inner walls have several small splits
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Rear Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
corrosion under car /inner sills both sides/floor ns os/
rear beam bushes in poor condition
slight leak inner driveshaft boots
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Power steering pump has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
floor getting corroded
power steering pipe corroded
Offside Rear wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.6.1)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Power steering pump has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
floor getting corroded
o/s/r tyre 3mm heavily cracked
power steering pipe corroded
Front brake disc excessively scored (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Front brake disc slightly scored (3.5.1h)
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LW52 FUM is a 2002 Ford Puma in Silver with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.8%.
Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LW52 FUM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LW52 FUM?
You can check the full history of LW52 FUM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LW52 FUM registered?
LW52 FUM is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 12 October 2002.
Is LW52 FUM safe to buy?
The MOT history for LW52 FUM shows 16 tests with a 68.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LW52 FUM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LW52 FUM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.