MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
12,120 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Exhaust mounting deteriorated. (7.1.1.c)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Lower Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Nearside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Nearside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Offside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Offside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Oil leak
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d)
Front Brake lever cannot be applied smoothly (3.1.3d)
Front Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Front position lamp does not illuminate immediately when switched on (1.1.3a)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Rear Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Clutch lever positioned so it cannot be readily operated. (6.2.1g) DANGEROUS
Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Exhaust mounting deteriorated. (7.1.1.c)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Lower Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Nearside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Nearside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Offside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Offside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Oil leak
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Roller brake test indicates a slightly juddering brake (3.3.A1b)
Front Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Headlamp aim headlamp deteriorated but function not impaired (1.2.3a)
Nearside Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Nearside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Offside Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Offside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake hose slightly chafed (3.2.B3a)
Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
offside front footrest slight movement
clutch lever operation really stiff
Front Brake lever cannot be applied smoothly (3.1.3d)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Horn not working (1.7.3a)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Front Roller brake test indicates a slightly juddering brake (3.3.A1b)
Front Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Nearside Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Nearside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Offside Front Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Offside Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake hose slightly chafed (3.2.B3a)
Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
offside front footrest slight movement
clutch lever operation really stiff
Front Front position lamp insecure (1.1.1c)
Front Front suspension spring worn and seriously weakened (2.3.2b)
Front Horn not working (1.7.3a)
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Nearside Front Fairings so located that it is likely to impede the steering (2.1.2e)
traped cables afecting steering
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Wheel damaged but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Front Wheel has a slightly eccentric bead rim. (4.2.2)
Headlamp aim headlamp deteriorated but function not impaired (1.2.3a)
Lower Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Nearside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Offside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
slight movement nearside front footrest
slight movement offside front footrest
Brake fluid reservoir insecurely mounted (3.2.B1a)
Clutch lever positioned so it cannot be readily operated. (6.2.1g)
Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motor bicycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (7.1.2)
Front Brake performance not tested (3.3)
Front mudguard can easily contact the tyre (2.3.7)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Nearside Handlebar handgrip not secure to handlebars. (2.1.1c)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Brake fluid reservoir fluid level dangerously low (3.2.B1d)
Rear Brake pedal is positioned so that the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Exhaust mounting does not fully support the exhaust system (7.1.1.c)
Rear Hydraulic brake control feels spongy (3.1.4a)
Rear Tyre valve stem damaged which could cause sudden tyre deflation (4.1.2c)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
Nearside Front Brake component has an inadequate repair (3.1.5) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Front Wheel damaged but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Front Wheel has a slightly eccentric bead rim. (4.2.2)
Lower Rear suspension bush has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Nearside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Offside Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength (3.2.A1)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Rear suspension bearing has slight free play (2.4.A2a(i))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
slight movement nearside front footrest
slight movement offside front footrest
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
gear lever repaired with bolt through lever.
gear lever repaired with bolt through lever.
Nearside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.5.1b)
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.5.1b)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.5.1b)
Offside Front Direction indicator deteriorated and function impaired (1.5.3a)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
How Reliable is the Suzuki SV650?
Based on 176,678 MOT tests across 15,165 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LX53 ENJ is a 2003 Suzuki SV650 in Bronze with a 645cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 53.3%.
Across all 2003 Suzuki SV650 models, the average MOT pass rate is 83.3% with a typical mileage of 17,088 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki SV650 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 2,801 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LX53 ENJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki SV650 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 23 years old, this Suzuki SV650 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LX53 ENJ?
You can check the full history of LX53 ENJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LX53 ENJ registered?
LX53 ENJ is a 2003 Suzuki SV650, first registered on 17 November 2003.
Is LX53 ENJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for LX53 ENJ shows 15 tests with a 53.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LX53 ENJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LX53 ENJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.