MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
123,131 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both (1.1.11 (c))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both (1.1.11 (c))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective both (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
underbody corrosion
Central Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive rear diff (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Front Wheel bearing has slight play Both (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Rear OSR fog lamp shows some lamp damage to lens
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin Rear brake pads starting to to wear thin (3.5.1g)
Rear Oil leak Rear axle shows some misting of oil out of seal. ()
Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both front inner (2.4.G.2)
Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both front outer (2.4.G.2)
Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both rear (2.4.G.2)
Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both Front Inner (2.4.G.2)
Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both Front Outer (2.4.G.2)
Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both Rear Inner (2.4.G.2)
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Tested in a wet condition
Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
nearside front Tyre tread worn low on outer shoulder
offside front Tyre tread worn low on inner shoulder
both anti roll bar eye bushes worn o/s/f and n/s/f
gear box mount worn excess movement
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
both anti roll bar eye bushes worn o/s/f and n/s/f
gear box mount worn excess movement
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Vehicle tested in a wet condition
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Vehicle tested in a wet condition
Nail in nearside rear tyre
Nearside Outer Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Outer Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
rear brake pads getting low
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab?
Based on 774,794 MOT tests across 49,827 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LY53 SXD is a 2003 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab in Black with a 2,477cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81%.
Across all 2003 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.4% with a typical mileage of 88,180 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,357 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LY53 SXD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 23 years old, this Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LY53 SXD?
You can check the full history of LY53 SXD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LY53 SXD registered?
LY53 SXD is a 2003 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab, first registered on 31 December 2003.
Is LY53 SXD safe to buy?
The MOT history for LY53 SXD shows 21 tests with a 81% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LY53 SXD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LY53 SXD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.