MOT Status
ValidMileage
49,582 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective Chipped (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier ADVANCED (4.13 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
signs of previous binding to offside rear wheel
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
exhaust system corroded
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3mm (5.2.3 (e))
clutch biting point excessively low
corrosion in general to exhaust system
offside headlamp aim pattern poor, but beam image still visable
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Rear fog lamp switch inoperative (4.5.3 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3mm (5.2.3 (e))
clutch biting point excessively low
corrosion in general to exhaust system
offside headlamp aim pattern poor, but beam image still visable
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
chip to o/s headlight
corrosion to exhaust
poor pattern o/s headlight
uneven wear n/s/r tyre
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Borderline (3.7.B.5b)
Heavy surface corrosion all suspension components and rear sub frame
advanced corrosion rear exhaust box
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened corroded (3.5.1i)
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Borderline (3.7.B.5b)
Heavy surface corrosion all suspension components and rear sub frame
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
advanced corrosion rear exhaust box
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened corroded (3.5.1i)
Slight binding rear wheels / brakes
Surface corrosion all suspension componants
advanced corrosion exhaust box
front parking (secondary) brake imbalance requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.6b)
o/s headlight stonechipped
poor pattern o/s headlight
slight binding o/s/r wheel
uneven wear n/s/r tyre
washers could be better
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Rear Tie bar/rod rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
corrosion to exhaust
Nearside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)
Power steering inoperative (2.3.3a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
both front wheel bearings noisy
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
Rear Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Nearside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
How Reliable is the MG Mgf?
Based on 546,238 MOT tests across 40,565 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M1 VVC is a 1996 MG Mgf in Red with a 1,796cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 83.3%.
Across all 1996 MG Mgf models, the average MOT pass rate is 63.4% with a typical mileage of 73,863 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a MG Mgf fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 37,610 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M1 VVC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The MG Mgf typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 30 years old, this MG Mgf is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M1 VVC?
You can check the full history of M1 VVC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M1 VVC registered?
M1 VVC is a 1996 MG Mgf, first registered on 17 July 1996.
Is M1 VVC safe to buy?
The MOT history for M1 VVC shows 18 tests with a 83.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M1 VVC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M1 VVC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.