MOT Status
ValidMileage
132,188 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Outer Sill corroded
Offside Rear Outer Sill corroded.
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component Steering rack (2.1.5 (a))
Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Outer sill corroded
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush Both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Seats were folded down
Steering rack has slight misting of oil
Both headlights faded
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Outer Sill corroded.
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Outer Sill corroded.
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Both headlights faded
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Outer Sill corroded.
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Outer Sill corroded.
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Both sun visor's mounting clips broken
Brake pedal wearing smooth anti-slip rubber worn on edge (1.1.2 (c))
Engine bay covers obscuring testable components & prescribed areas
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 19% on roller brake test (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test ()
Both number plate lights flickering
Horn tone weak
Offside Front Side light flickering
Central Brake light not working
Offside Rear Brake binding slightly
Offside Rear Bump stop missing
3rd row of seats not in use at time of test
Nearside Front Outer CV boot leaking grease
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge bald on outer edge (5.2.3 (e))
high level stop light inoperative
Nearside headlamp beam pattern structure poor
parking brake cables chafing on nearside rear anti roll bar linkage
slight imbalance on rear service brake application
Both handbrake cables fouling n/s/r anti roll bar link.
Offside Steering arm has relative movement at its fixings (2.2.B.1h)
Both handbrake cables fouling n/s/r anti roll bar link.
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Nearside oil seepage rack gaiter
Offside Rear Valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside Steering pivot point has slight play rack arm (2.2.B.1g)
Oil leak ()
Coolant leak
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
slight play in o/s/f inner track arm
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Oil leak around steering rack
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
steering rack damp
Nearside Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
both front sills slightly damaged
both rear brakes binding slightly
o/s handbrake efficiency lower than n/s. On visual check lever does not move much when operated.
Front brake disc slightly scored (3.5.1h)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
centre & o/s centre seats missing on test
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
No emission read out due to the very low smoke levels
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
all tyres tread getting low
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M2 USD is a 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Grey with a 2,776cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 90.5%.
Across all 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.7% with a typical mileage of 85,434 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M2 USD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 21 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M2 USD?
You can check the full history of M2 USD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M2 USD registered?
M2 USD is a 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 17 August 2005.
Is M2 USD safe to buy?
The MOT history for M2 USD shows 21 tests with a 90.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M2 USD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M2 USD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.