MOT Status
ValidMileage
61,258 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively warped (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Clutch lever bent (6.2.7 (b))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Road spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Clutch lever incorrectly positioned Pivot worn (6.2.7 (b))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake pedal has insufficient reserve travel Fowling exhaust (1.1.2 (a))
Clutch lever incorrectly positioned Pivot worn (6.2.7 (b))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit PERISHING (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake binding but not excessively ROLLER TEST (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened TORSION ARM (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened DAMPER CASING (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Fuel system component leaking (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake pedal is positioned so that the brake cannot be readily applied brake pedal hits exhaust (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Rear Brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm area and mounting area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
center stand pivots worn
side stand pivot worn
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Drive chain so worn it is likely to fail (6.1.7 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Tyre tread not clearly visible (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
CLUTCH CABLE EXCESSIVELY WORN
CLUTCH LEVER PIVOT EXCESSIVELY WORN
Front Brake cylinder corroded but not seriously weakened MASTER CYLINDER (1.1.16 (d) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Motorcycle structure slightly corroded Swing arm (6.1.1a)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Stop lamp damaged and function impaired (1.3.3a)
Rear wheel bearings have excessive free play (2.4.A.2c)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Clutch cable frayed and about to break.bite point of clutch faulty
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Front Brake fluid reservoir fluid level low (3.2.B1d)
Front Brake fluid reservoir fluid level low (3.2.B1d)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Inner Rear Brake pad(s) (sintered type) less than 1.0mm thick (3.2A1f(ii))
How Reliable is the Yamaha XJ600?
Based on 74,677 MOT tests across 7,907 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M365 AEW is a 1994 Yamaha XJ600 in Green with a 598cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 27 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 1994 Yamaha XJ600 models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.1% with a typical mileage of 30,731 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Yamaha XJ600 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 1,271 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M365 AEW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Yamaha XJ600 typically stays on UK roads for around 37 years. At 32 years old, this Yamaha XJ600 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M365 AEW?
You can check the full history of M365 AEW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M365 AEW registered?
M365 AEW is a 1994 Yamaha XJ600, first registered on 16 September 1994.
Is M365 AEW safe to buy?
The MOT history for M365 AEW shows 27 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M365 AEW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M365 AEW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.