MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
28,766 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Lower Brake hose connection leaking (1.1.12 (c)) DANGEROUS
Stop lamp does not illuminate by the operation of both brake controls (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Indicator Switch thumb cover missing but does operate.
Offside Front Headlamp on off Switch Thumb cover missing but does operate.
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Drive chain excessively loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Steering operation restricted in free movement from lock to lock (2.1.4 (c))
Front Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Brake linkage has abnormal movement of levers indicating excessive wear or maladjustment (1.1.15 (f))
Rear Registration plate lamp missing in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the wheel raised (2.2.1b)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Nearside Rear Direction indicators affected by the operation of another lamp Brake light (1.5.1c)
Offside Rear Direction indicators affected by the operation of another lamp Effected by rear brake light (1.5.1c)
Rear Rear position lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.3b)
Rear Rear reflector on motorcycle does not reflect squarely to the rear (1.4.1)
Rear Rear wheel bearings have excessive free play (2.4.A.2c)
Rear Stop lamp affected by the operation of another lamp (1.3.2)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Offside Front Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Play in gear lever bush, badly worn
Rear Motorcycle structure has been slightly modified Rear sub frame has been modified (6.1.1b)
Rear Nail in tyre ()
Rear Rear drive chain very dry
Rear Wiring loom rubbing on front brake hose and fork leg. Possibility of shorting out wiring loom
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Steering control handlebar movement restricted by trapped cables (2.1.2c)
Front front tyer flat
Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Offside Handlebar deformed (2.1.1b)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Registration plate margin less than the minimum requirement (6.3.4g)
Front Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2a)
Rear Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Roller brake test Higher brake efficiency normally obtainable. (3.3.A2b)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
How Reliable is the Suzuki RF600?
Based on 8,517 MOT tests across 1,043 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M399 AVW is a 1995 Suzuki RF600 in Green with a 599cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 62.5%.
Across all 1995 Suzuki RF600 models, the average MOT pass rate is 78.0% with a typical mileage of 25,834 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki RF600 fails its MOT is roller brake test indicates a binding brake, accounting for 262 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M399 AVW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki RF600 typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 31 years old, this Suzuki RF600 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M399 AVW?
You can check the full history of M399 AVW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M399 AVW registered?
M399 AVW is a 1995 Suzuki RF600, first registered on 31 December 1995.
Is M399 AVW safe to buy?
The MOT history for M399 AVW shows 16 tests with a 62.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M399 AVW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M399 AVW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.