MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
176,265 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced inner sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
LPG gas tank cover clip broken
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tread area (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Under sill area corroded and holed outside prescribed areas
Nearside and offside front tyres worn on edges
Nearside and offside rear wheel arches corroded
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Under sill area corroded Nearside and offside
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Split (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Split (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Split (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
LPG gas tank cover clip broken
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tread area (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Under sill area corroded and holed outside prescribed areas
Nearside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside and offside front tyres worn on edges
Nearside and offside rear wheel arches corroded
Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Cracking (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust heat shield slightly insecure
Under sill area corroded Nearside and offside
Front tyres worn on edges
Front under sill areas corroded
Headlamp aims slightly poor
Nearside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Rear exhaust heat shield slightly insecure
Rear wheel arch areas corroded
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear wheel arches corroded
headlight lenses frosting
o/s/f and n/s/f undersills corroded
poor headlight beam images poor
Nearside Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength cross member within 30 cm of subframe mounting (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
front cross member ,o/s and n/s/r undersills and rear wheel arches corroded
headlight lenses frosting
poor headlight beam images poor
Front brake discs corroded on inner faces
Front brake pads worn low
Front tyres scrubbing out on edges
o/s/f and n/s/f undersills corroded
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Front brake discs corroded on inner faces
Front brake pads worn low
Front tyres scrubbing out on edges
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Rear brake pads look low?
headlight lenses frosted
o/s/f and n/s/f undersills corroded
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Rear tyre scrubbed out on outer edges
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Rear tyre scrubbed out on outer edges
Offside inner tail light not working
headlight lenses frosted
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
headlight lenses frosted
poor headlight beam images
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
engine check light on
headlight lenses frosted
poor headlight beam images
Front exhaust pipe joint corroded
Both headlamp lenses beam patterns poor
Both headlamp lenses frosted
Engine warning lamp on
Nearside Rear Tyre worn slightly on outer edge
engine check light on
headlight lenses scratched/frosting
poor headlight beam images
headlight lenses scratched/frosted
poor headlight beam images
front tyres wearing low on outer edges and cracking in tread areas
headlight lenses scratched/frosting
poor headlight beam images
rear tyres wearing low on inner edges and cracking in tread areas
all tyres cracking in tread areas
coolant expansion tank empty
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
all tyres cracking in tread areas
coolant expansion tank empty
Nearside Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
How Reliable is the Mazda Bongo?
Based on 251,584 MOT tests across 14,362 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M444 SPS is a 2012 Mazda Bongo in White with a 1,990cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.9%.
Across all 2012 Mazda Bongo models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.3% with a typical mileage of 130,007 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda Bongo fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 6,854 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M444 SPS, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda Bongo typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 14 years old, this Mazda Bongo is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M444 SPS?
You can check the full history of M444 SPS by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M444 SPS registered?
M444 SPS is a 2012 Mazda Bongo, first registered on 1 June 2012.
Is M444 SPS safe to buy?
The MOT history for M444 SPS shows 21 tests with a 61.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M444 SPS have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M444 SPS. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.