MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
141,175 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Both sides wiper rubber split.
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated Both sides. (3.6.B.4d)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear Centre brake light not working.
Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides. (2.4.G.2)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front Tyre(s) incorrect because different size tyres are fitted on the same axle. (4.1.A.1a)
Offside Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
Front Both sides wiper rubber split.
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated Both sides. (3.6.B.4d)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear Centre brake light not working.
Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides. (2.4.G.2)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
both rear subframe bushes perishing
damage to front registration plate
offside front wishbone bushes starting to seperate
slight judder nearside reasr foot brake
some brake pedal travel
upper engine stabilizer bush torn
Nearside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Nearside front brake juddering severely (3.7.A.2b)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside front brake juddering severely (3.7.A.2b)
both rear subframe bushes perishing
damage to front registration plate
fanbelt perishing
offside front wishbone bushes starting to seperate
slight judder nearside reasr foot brake
some brake pedal travel
upper engine stabilizer bush torn
crack to fornt number plate
n/s headlight aim beam pattern weakening
rear subframe bushes heavily perished
slight front brake judder
slight steering rod/rack play
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Rear Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
crack to fornt number plate
n/s headlight aim beam pattern weakening
rear subframe bushes heavily perished
slight front brake judder
slight steering rod/rack play
nearside front wishbone bushes weakening
rear subframe bushes perishing especially nearside
slight nearside and offside steering rack/rod play
some damage to front registartion plate
front wishbones bushes seperating
offside front lock stop pad missing
rear subframe bushes perishing
slight front brake judder
both front tyres close to legal limit - recommend replace
engine stabiliser bush split
o/s/f wishbone inner bushes separating
rear subframe bushes heavily perished
offside front wishbone bushes starting to seperate
rear registration plate delaminating
rear subframe front bushes perishing
some steering rack play
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Outer Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Outer Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear rear brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.5b)
engine stabilizer bush u/s.
How Reliable is the Volvo 800 Series?
Based on 372,763 MOT tests across 41,605 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M459 FFP is a 1994 Volvo 800 Series in White with a 2,435cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 78.6%.
Across all 1994 Volvo 800 Series models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 136,744 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo 800 Series fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 20,209 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M459 FFP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo 800 Series typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 32 years old, this Volvo 800 Series is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M459 FFP?
You can check the full history of M459 FFP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M459 FFP registered?
M459 FFP is a 1994 Volvo 800 Series, first registered on 1 August 1994.
Is M459 FFP safe to buy?
The MOT history for M459 FFP shows 14 tests with a 78.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M459 FFP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M459 FFP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.