MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
88,689 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Under the body covered with underseal
Exhaust carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits (8.2.1.2 (a))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content at idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Coolant leak radiator and front of engine ()
Nearside Rear Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened pad no braking over entire surface of disc (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front a pilar / sill corroded
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (8.2.1.2 (c))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content at idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
Nearside Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced no pattern (4.1.4 (b))
Coolant leak radiator and front of engine ()
Nearside Rear Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened pad no braking over entire surface of disc (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front a pilar / sill corroded
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Coolant leak ()
Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect both (5.3.2 (b))
Front both coil springs different from side to side
Offside Front a pillar corroded inner door aperture
Offside headlight lens cracked not affecting image or sharp edge
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Outer Suspension arm ball joint likely to become detached split pin missing rear most radius arm (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Coolant leak ()
Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect both (5.3.2 (b))
Front both coil springs different from side to side
Offside Front a pillar corroded inner door aperture
Offside headlight lens cracked not affecting image or sharp edge
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits (8.2.1.2 (a))
Exhaust carbon monoxide content at idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect no image (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded under floor cover (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Floor excessively deteriorated between fire wall and floor pan under brake pipes (6.2.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired wing (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect no image (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength floor pan and inner sill as marked (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) incorrectly mounted both retaining r clips missing (1.1.13 (c)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) incorrectly mounted one r clip missing (1.1.13 (c)) DANGEROUS
Coolant leak ()
Front Coil spring modified but not seriously weakened different coils fitted side to side (5.3.1 (d) (i))
Offside Front Inner a pilar corroded
Offside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Bumper mountings corroded but not likely to become detached rear most of inner wheel arch (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Offside headlight cracked no sharp edge
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front slight binding
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Rear wheel binding
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive tie bars front mount areas slight corrion (2.4.A.3)
all disc have surface rust
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded front tie bar mount area corroded /inner wheel arch (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front slight binding
Nearside Rear wheel binding
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive tie bars front mount areas slight corrion (2.4.A.3)
all disc have surface rust
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Nearside Front coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Centre Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Oil leak
Rear brake pads look 1/2 worn
Centre Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
How Reliable is the Suzuki Cappuccino?
Based on 11,869 MOT tests across 1,070 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M989 UDP is a 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino in Green with a 658cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 55%.
Across all 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.4% with a typical mileage of 61,292 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki Cappuccino fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 1,923 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M989 UDP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki Cappuccino typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 31 years old, this Suzuki Cappuccino is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M989 UDP?
You can check the full history of M989 UDP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M989 UDP registered?
M989 UDP is a 1995 Suzuki Cappuccino, first registered on 31 December 1995.
Is M989 UDP safe to buy?
The MOT history for M989 UDP shows 20 tests with a 55% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M989 UDP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M989 UDP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.