MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
107,963 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake pipe slightly corroded all brake pipes (3.6.B.2c)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Nearside Front tyre slight age cracks on sidewall not exposing cords at time of test
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive rearmost (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Offside Front tyre slight age cracks on sidewall not exposing cords at time of test
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive rearmost (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear wheel slight brake drag
hand brake cable deteriorating
underside of vehicle heavy surface corrosion
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Lower Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded foremost seat belt (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill inner sill area (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Brake pipe slightly corroded all brake pipes (3.6.B.2c)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Nearside Front tyre slight age cracks on sidewall not exposing cords at time of test
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive rearmost (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Offside Front tyre slight age cracks on sidewall not exposing cords at time of test
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive rearmost (2.4.A.3)
hand brake cable deteriorating
underside of vehicle heavy surface corrosion
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill ,area (2.4.A.3)
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated anchor pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.B.2)
Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated shackle pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.B.2)
both nearside and offside front tyres beginning to perish
considerable surface corrosion to many rear chassis and suspension components
inner faces of both front brake discs deteriorating
nearside park brake cable rusting at front joint
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
n/s front o/s front and o/s rear tyre slight ageing cracks on sidewalls
rear chassis slight corrosion
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
n/s front o/s front and o/s rear tyre slight ageing cracks on sidewalls
rear chassis slight corrosion
Rear Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Rear Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake lever defective so that it cannot be satisfactorily operated (3.1.3c)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Centre Rear Seat belt affected by an insecure seat fixing (5.2.1b)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
damage on nearside of windscreen noted.but does not affect drivers view
front brake pads fairly thin(approx 2000 miles?)
offside front tyre approx 2.5 mm.
some deterioration in rear number plate,not affecting legibility
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
crack evident in nearside of windscreen,may "travel" with continued vehicle use
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Body has a sharp edge caused by damage (6.1.C.1)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
crack evident in nearside of windscreen,may "travel" with continued vehicle use
How Reliable is the Chrysler-jeep Grand Voyager?
Based on 92,580 MOT tests across 6,601 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
ML02 GKU is a 2002 Chrysler-jeep Grand Voyager in Blue with a 3,301cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.2%.
Across all 2002 Chrysler-jeep Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.9% with a typical mileage of 93,863 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Chrysler-jeep Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 6,052 recorded failures. If you're considering buying ML02 GKU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler-jeep Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Chrysler-jeep Grand Voyager is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of ML02 GKU?
You can check the full history of ML02 GKU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was ML02 GKU registered?
ML02 GKU is a 2002 Chrysler-jeep Grand Voyager, first registered on 30 April 2002.
Is ML02 GKU safe to buy?
The MOT history for ML02 GKU shows 19 tests with a 63.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does ML02 GKU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on ML02 GKU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.