MOT Status
ValidMileage
92,891 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
all front and rear brake pads wearing thin
all front and rear brake pads wearing thin
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Central Rear Tyre slightly damaged outer sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin both sides around 2mm (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread deteriorated/damage (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear light unit insecure
Nearside Rear unusual noise can be heard while applying the brakes during testing
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing outer shoulder coming bald (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear light unit insecure
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin both sides around 2mm (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Undertray not fully secure engine (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view middle lower part stone chips (3.2 (a) (i))
Driver's view of the road through the swept area of the windscreen significantly affected by an obstruction middle sticker (3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords outer tread (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim not tested lense full of condensation it might fail for aim (4.1.2 (b))
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Side repeater lens defective such that the emitted light is adversely affected lens missing (4.4.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Side repeater light intensity significantly reduced (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed outer tread (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Rear Tyre slightly damaged outer sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin both sides around 2mm (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread deteriorated/damage (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear light unit insecure
Nearside Rear unusual noise can be heard while applying the brakes during testing
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing outer shoulder coming bald (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear light unit insecure
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin both sides around 2mm (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Undertray not fully secure engine (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view middle lower part (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
covers & undertrays obscuring some components
Nearside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
covers & undertrays obscuring some components
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Undertray not fully secure (8.1.1 (b) (i))
covers & undertrays obscuring some components
Headlamp cleaning device for LED or HID headlamp inoperative offside & nearside (4.1.6 (a) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen washer not working NOTE: wiper performance NOT tested (3.5 (a))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Undertray not fully secure (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
covers & undertrays obscuring some components
Front wiper blade are worn
Engine undertray insecure
Nearside Rear tyres worn outer shoulder coming bald
Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear tyre bald at outer shoulder
Both rear tyres are wearing on outer edge
Engine covers and under trays fitted obscuring some components
Rear brake discs are slightly worn and lipped
Driver's seat fore and aft adjustment mechanism not functioning as intended. (6.2.A.3)
Both rear tyres are starting to wear on outer edge
Engine covers and under trays fitted obscuring some components
Front wipers are starting to smear
Rear brake discs are slightly worn and lipped
Nearside Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside front tyre worn outer shoulder
Nearside front tyre bald outer shoulder
nearside front tyre outer tread feathered
offside front tyure cut in outer side wall
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
ML11 HDO is a 2011 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Black with a 2,776cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 2011 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.8% with a typical mileage of 74,858 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying ML11 HDO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 15 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of ML11 HDO?
You can check the full history of ML11 HDO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was ML11 HDO registered?
ML11 HDO is a 2011 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 31 May 2011.
Is ML11 HDO safe to buy?
The MOT history for ML11 HDO shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does ML11 HDO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on ML11 HDO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.