MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
99,324 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Slight front brake imbalance
20% front brake imbalance o/s lower
Coolant leak radiator ()
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
20% front brake imbalance o/s lower
Coolant leak radiator ()
Ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt drop arm (2.2.C.1c)
rear brake application uneven Nearside lower (3.7.B.2)
Ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt drop arm (2.2.C.1c)
Offside front brake sticking on a little
Some front brake imbalance
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Noisy offside front brake
Some front and rear brake inbalance and fluctuation
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside rear brake sticking on a little
Some corrosion offside rear outside prescribed area
Weak headlamp aim patterns
Fuel cap/sealing device sealing washer deteriorated (7.2.4c)
Offside Rear Upper Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside rear brake sticking on
Weak headlamp aim patterns
Nearside rear brake effort lower by 24%
Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Nearside rear brake effort lower by 24%
Offside Front Seat belt stitching slightly frayed (5.2.2b)
Offside inner track rod end joint cover split/missing
Offside outer track rod end joint cover split/missing
Suspension joint nearside lower dust cover split/missing
Suspension joint offside lower dust cover split/missing
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Offside Front Seat belt stitching slightly frayed (5.2.2b)
Offside inner track rod end joint cover split/missing
Offside outer track rod end joint cover split/missing
Suspension joint nearside lower dust cover split/missing
Suspension joint offside lower dust cover split/missing
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Under side of vehicle rusty
Nearside Front Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
Offside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Oil leak
Uderside of vehicle heavily covered with surface corrosion
fuel pipes to rear slightly corroded
offside wing mirror glass cracked
Nearside rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
Offside rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
carb mixture a little rich (o.k) for mot
Front Tie bar/rod rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Tie bar/rod rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
off side rear suspension low
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) excessively damaged so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Offside Stop lamp excessively damaged so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.2.1d)
Offside rear brakes release unevenly (3.7.B.4)
How Reliable is the Nissan Laurel?
Based on 3,076 MOT tests across 502 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
MNP 156T is a 1979 Nissan Laurel in Yellow with a 1,998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 1979 Nissan Laurel models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.6% with a typical mileage of 61,540 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Laurel fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 223 recorded failures. If you're considering buying MNP 156T, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Laurel typically stays on UK roads for around 47 years. At 47 years old, this Nissan Laurel is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of MNP 156T?
You can check the full history of MNP 156T by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was MNP 156T registered?
MNP 156T is a 1979 Nissan Laurel, first registered on 1 March 1979.
Is MNP 156T safe to buy?
The MOT history for MNP 156T shows 21 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does MNP 156T have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on MNP 156T. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.