MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
93,840 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Rear Shock absorbers has negligible damping effect Both (5.3.2 (d))
Rear Upper Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush Both (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Inner Tyre has ply or cords exposed Sidewall perished and split (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Coil spring missing and directional control affected Both (5.3.1 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Sub-frame pin or bush likely to become detached Both (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Rusty (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Outer Tyre slightly damaged Side wall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Rusty (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin fronts (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin rears (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
rear exhaust mounting broken but still supported
Brake pad(s) wearing thin fronts (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin rears (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both front (4.1.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both front (3.4 (b) (ii))
rear exhaust mounting broken but still supported
Nearside Headlamp aim too high n (1.8)
oil residue on underside of sump
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
n/s/f tyre wearing on inner edge
o/s/f tyre wearing on inner edge
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
n/s/f tyre wearing on inner edge
o/s/f tyre wearing on inner edge
Nearside Rear Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Rear Rear position lamp(s) obscured but not more than 50% (1.1.A.3c)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
front disc slightly worn
Rear Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
How Reliable is the Volvo C70?
Based on 351,562 MOT tests across 21,746 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
MT52 TFX is a 2002 Volvo C70 in Silver with a 2,435cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2002 Volvo C70 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.3% with a typical mileage of 77,814 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo C70 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 11,186 recorded failures. If you're considering buying MT52 TFX, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo C70 typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 24 years old, this Volvo C70 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of MT52 TFX?
You can check the full history of MT52 TFX by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was MT52 TFX registered?
MT52 TFX is a 2002 Volvo C70, first registered on 29 November 2002.
Is MT52 TFX safe to buy?
The MOT history for MT52 TFX shows 18 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does MT52 TFX have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on MT52 TFX. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.