MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
31,949 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sill sections (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Brake pipe excessively corroded main feed to rear (1.1.11 (c))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sill sections (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component rack (2.1.5 (a))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sills (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength outer sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component rack (2.1.5 (a))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sills (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Brake pipe slightly corroded both main feed to rear corroded under metal cover panel to front floor area (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Power steering ram(s) has slight seepage from a seal steering rack gator misting of oil (2.3.3b)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sills (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Brake pipe slightly corroded both main feed to rear corroded under metal cover panel to front floor area (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Power steering ram(s) has slight seepage from a seal steering rack gator misting of oil (2.3.3b)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sills (2.4.A.3)
Front Front suspension has slight deterioration of the bonding between metal and flexible material of an upper support bearing both strut tops (2.5.B.3a)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (3.7.B.5b)
Front Front suspension has slight deterioration of the bonding between metal and flexible material of an upper support bearing both strut tops (2.5.B.3a)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Brake pipe slightly corroded both main feed to rear under front floor (3.6.B.2c)
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both lower spring cup mountings (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
misting of oil around o/s rack gator
Steering rack gaiter deteriorated (2.2.D.2d)
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Steering rack gaiter deteriorated (2.2.D.2d)
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
nsf brake pipe corroded
osf brake grabbing
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
nsf brake pipe corroded
osf brake grabbing
rear seat base missing
front brake pads look low
nail in n/s/r tyre
slight surface corrsion on both rear outter and n/s/f outer metal brake pipes
How Reliable is the Daewoo Lanos?
Based on 343,953 MOT tests across 41,564 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
MV52 SZK is a 2002 Daewoo Lanos in Red with a 1,349cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2002 Daewoo Lanos models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.7% with a typical mileage of 49,807 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Daewoo Lanos fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 50,738 recorded failures. If you're considering buying MV52 SZK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Daewoo Lanos typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Daewoo Lanos is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of MV52 SZK?
You can check the full history of MV52 SZK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was MV52 SZK registered?
MV52 SZK is a 2002 Daewoo Lanos, first registered on 1 September 2002.
Is MV52 SZK safe to buy?
The MOT history for MV52 SZK shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does MV52 SZK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on MV52 SZK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.