MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
86,701 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded inner and outer sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner and outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm inner (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded inner and outer sill (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner and outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Body has slight corrosion inner sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Body has slight corrosion inner sill (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
sills have been plated etc
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low and too far to the left. (1.8)
front tyres worn on edges
nearside headlamp aim is on upper limit
various body/bumper defects
various oil seepage
Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
front tyres worn on edges
nearside headlamp aim is on upper limit
slight binding at nearside front wheel
various body/bumper defects
various oil seepage
front brake pads will require checking in approx 2500 miles
front tyres worn on edges
nearside outer cv gaitor perished
oil leak present
rear and nearside front wipers split
various body/bumper defects
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
front brake pads will require checking in approx 2500 miles
front tyres worn on edges
nearside outer cv gaitor perished
oil leak present
rear and nearside front wipers split
various body/bumper defects
front body cross member corroded
front brake pads low o/s/f
o/s/r tyrelow on inner shoulder also starting to crack/perish
various corroded brake pipes
Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
front body cross member corroded
front brake pads low o/s/f
o/s/r tyrelow on inner shoulder also starting to crack/perish
various corroded brake pipes
near side c/v gaiter perished
near side rear tyre wearing low
oil leak from oil pressure switch
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
auto box fluid leak at radiator
near side c/v gaiter perished
near side rear tyre wearing low
oil leak from oil pressure switch
power steering fluid leak at steering rack
wiper blades split
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
auto box cooling pipe seeping at radiator
possible oil pressure light switch leaking oil
rear of both door sills starting to show signs of rust
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
auto box cooling pipe seeping at radiator
possible oil pressure light switch leaking oil
rear of both door sills starting to show signs of rust
as per original test date April 04th 2007.15:11.
Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
corrosion in rear of offside sill panel
imbalance between front brakes
uneven rise and fall between rear brakes
various oil leaks
How Reliable is the Nissan Almera?
Based on 2,976,239 MOT tests across 231,560 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
N375 FTW is a 1996 Nissan Almera in Silver with a 1,597cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 57.1%.
Across all 1996 Nissan Almera models, the average MOT pass rate is 63.9% with a typical mileage of 87,906 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Almera fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 141,538 recorded failures. If you're considering buying N375 FTW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Almera typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 30 years old, this Nissan Almera is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of N375 FTW?
You can check the full history of N375 FTW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was N375 FTW registered?
N375 FTW is a 1996 Nissan Almera, first registered on 5 April 1996.
Is N375 FTW safe to buy?
The MOT history for N375 FTW shows 21 tests with a 57.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does N375 FTW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on N375 FTW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.