MOT Status
ValidMileage
167,256 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge o\s\f\ n\s\f (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect n\s\f\ o\s\f (4.1.2 (c))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge o\s\f\ n\s\f (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated leak from clip (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
all rear Busch suspension worn
Coil spring corroded all springs (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Engine covers fitted not allowing full inspection
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Undertrays fitted not allowing full inspection
Offside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Coil spring corroded all springs (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Engine covers fitted not allowing full inspection
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Undertrays fitted not allowing full inspection
Engine covers fitted not allowing full inspection
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Undertrays fitted not allowing full inspection
Engine bay covers are fitted to the vehicle
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Tyre at 3mm (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Undertrays are fitted to the vehicle
Engine bay covers are fitted to the vehicle
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Tyre at 3mm (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Undertrays are fitted to the vehicle
Engine covers fitted not allowing full inspection
Exhaust system deteriorating
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2.5mm (5.2.3 (e))
Undertrays fitted not allowing full inspection
Exhaust system insecure rear silencer (6.1.2 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Engine covers fitted not allowing full inspection
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases rear silencer (6.1.2 (a))
Exhaust system deteriorating
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2.5mm (5.2.3 (e))
Undertrays fitted not allowing full inspection
Engine bay covers are fitted to the vehicle
Rear Unable to fully inspect additional rear seat belts
Undertrays are fitted to the vehicle
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Engine bay covers are fitted to the vehicle
Rear Unable to fully inspect additional rear seat belts
Undertrays are fitted to the vehicle
Engine covers fitted not allowing full inspection
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3.0mm (5.2.3 (e))
Undertrays fitted not allowing full inspection
Nearside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Engine covers fitted not allowing full inspection
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3.0mm (5.2.3 (e))
Undertrays fitted not allowing full inspection
Front Both dip beams have been adjusted to the correct height
Front Both dip beams have been adjusted to the correct height
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low Dip beam has been adjusted to the correct height (1.8)
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low Dip beam has been adjusted to the correct height (1.8)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
NA61 URU is a 2011 Volvo XC90 in Black with a 2,400cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.9%.
Across all 2011 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.0% with a typical mileage of 85,814 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying NA61 URU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 15 years old, this Volvo XC90 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of NA61 URU?
You can check the full history of NA61 URU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was NA61 URU registered?
NA61 URU is a 2011 Volvo XC90, first registered on 24 October 2011.
Is NA61 URU safe to buy?
The MOT history for NA61 URU shows 21 tests with a 61.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does NA61 URU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on NA61 URU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.